MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411744482 · doi:10.1093/humrep/deaf097.086

O-086 Survival of the fittest: unravelling aneuploid cell depletion in mosaic embryos

2025· article· en· W4411744482 sur OpenAlexaff
Sheldon J. J. Kwok, Stewart J. Russell, Hanna Bałakier, Lilach Marom Haham, S Chen, Manuel Viotti, Christo Zouves, Svetlana Madjunkova, Clifford Librach

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Reproduction · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePluripotent Stem Cells Research
Établissements canadiensCReATe Fertility CentreUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyEmbryoSurvival of the fittestZygoteSurvival analysisGeneticsAndrologyEmbryogenesisMedicineInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Study question What molecular mechanisms trigger aneuploid cell depletion in post-implantation mosaic embryos, enabling self-correction and pregnancy success? Summary answer Aneuploid cell depletion in day 9-11 mosaic embryos is driven by disrupted stress responses, pluripotency dysregulation and impaired energy expenditure, mediated by aneuploid-euploid cell competition. What is known already Embryo aneuploidy is a major cause of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, mosaic embryos - especially those with low-level aneuploidy (<50%), have significantly higher developmental potential, resulting in ongoing pregnancy and live birth of normal babies. Although their implantation rates are lower than euploid embryos, multicenter data from over 3,500 mosaic embryo transfers show that only 1.2% of mosaicism persists during pregnancy and postnatally, suggesting a self-correction capacity in many mosaic embryos. Despite these promising outcomes, the use of mosaic embryos in IVF remains limited due to an incomplete understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying their developmental success. Study design, size, duration Donated preimplantation euploid, aneuploid and mosaic embryos from the CReATe Fertility Centre and Zouves Fertility Center (Veritas IRB protocol #16580) were cultured from day 5-6 to day 9-11. 3870 cells from 31 post-implantation embryos (aneuploid, n = 7; mosaic, n = 8; euploid, n = 16) were included for single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis. An iPSC-based mosaic model was established by co-culturing euploid and reversine-treated (aneuploid) naive iPSCs in a transwell system for 96 hours. Participants/materials, setting, methods Cultured embryos were dissociated into single cells and pooled for scRNA-seq (10x Chromium). Sequencing results were analyzed using Freemuxlet to identify embryo-of-origin, Seurat for clustering, and InferCNV to determine post-implantation cell ploidy. Lineage developmental trajectory was inferred from pseudotime analysis. Enriched genetic markers and pathways were identified through differential expression analyses. RT-qPCR and immunofluorescence assays were used to quantify gene and protein expression in iPSC models. Main results and the role of chance scRNA-seq data from 3870 embryonic cells revealed diverse post-implantation lineages, including epiblast, hypoblast, and multiple trophoblast subtypes. Transcriptomic and regulon analysis showed aneuploid cell survival was dependent on embryonic environments. In homogenous aneuploid embryos, we observed adaptive stress responses that support temporary survival and aneuploidy tolerance. This includes delayed differentiation across all lineages, upregulation of genes related to pluripotency (e.g. KLF4) and unfolded protein response (e.g. ATF4). In contrast, mosaic embryos exhibited complex cell competition dynamics, where aneuploid cells in mosaic embryos were driven toward pluripotency exit, evidenced by advanced progression along developmental trajectory and downregulated pluripotency genes. This shift was accompanied by disrupted homeostatic pathways, including glycolysis (e.g. MYC) and proteostasis (e.g. DDIT4), leading to elevated apoptotic activity (e.g. CASP8). Our iPSC-based mosaic model recapitulated differential fitness levels in mosaic embryos. In a mosaic environment, aneuploid iPSCs exhibited impaired viability and growth, along with significant downregulation of DDIT4 (log2FC=-3.16, p < 0.05), and KLF4 (log2FC=-0.54, p < 0.05). Enhanced autophagy was observed in euploid iPSCs, indicated by accumulation of LC3 complex, while aneuploid iPSCs displayed increased apoptotic signaling, marked by elevated Caspase-8 levels. Together, Our results pointed to a diminished survival advantage in the aneuploid cells of mosaic embryos, driving their selective depletion. Limitations, reasons for caution We compared the transcriptomic signatures of aneuploid cells in aneuploid and mosaic embryos. Expanding the sample size will improve generalizability of the findings. Furthermore, while the iPSC-based mosaic model mirrors key aspects of the mosaic environment, it may not fully recapitulate the complexity of in vivo embryonic development. Wider implications of the findings Our study unravels molecular mechanisms contributing to self-correction and pregnancy success of mosaic embryos. These results provide the foundation for interrogating developmental competence of mosaic embryos, potentially expanding the range of viable embryos suitable for IVF treatment and improving options for fertility preservation. Trial registration number No

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,316

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman ReproductionMême sujetPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchTravaux en français237 207