O-005 Advancement of a novel image-analysis artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict blastocyst ploidy development of mature oocytes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Study question Leveraging analysis by MAGENTA, can an additional AI model be developed to specifically predict the ploidy status (euploid/aneuploid) of individual mature oocytes in a cohort? Summary answer A non-invasive image-analysis Ploidy-AI model was developed to predict the likelihood of euploid blastocyst development of mature oocytes with an AUC of 0.71. What is known already MAGENTA is an AI-based model that assesses images of mature oocytes and provides a score (0-10) correlated to its likelihood of developing to a blastocyst-stage embryo, however research also shows correlation to blastocyst-ploidy (euploid/aneuploid) outcomes. Unlike sperm, the oocyte is responsible for most blastocyst-stage aneuploidies, as chromosome segregation during female meiosis is highly susceptible to errors, which increases with age. As such, a model trained to specifically predict the likelihood of a mature oocyte to develop into a euploid blastocyst, from a patient’s cohort of oocytes, could indicate greater clinical value regarding the quality and developmental potential of these oocytes. Study design, size, duration Retrospective study including 15,849 mature oocyte images (3746 patients, 4168 cycles) from 3 clinics (Canada, USA, Spain) obtained from EmbryoScope Time-Lapse incubators (Vitrolife), immediately post-ICSI. Oocyte images were acquired from cohorts with at least one blastocyst that underwent PGT-A. Oocytes that failed to develop into a blastocyst or became an aneuploid or euploid blastocyst were included and split into 60/20/20 for training, validation, and test subsets for model development. Mosaic or untested blastocysts were excluded. Participants/materials, setting, methods MAGENTA assessed 15,849 images providing a score and probability of blastocyst development. A Ploidy-AI model was then developed utilizing the images plus additional features (oocyte age, MAGENTA score and probability), to predict blastocyst-ploidy outcomes. The negative class were oocytes that failed blastulation/became an aneuploid blastocyst; positive class were those that became a euploid blastocyst. Once trained, the model’s probabilities were calibrated to adjust the prediction threshold from 0.50 to 0.28 –better reflecting true euploid development. Main results and the role of chance On the test set of 3,484 mature oocytes, the Ploidy-AI model predicted blastocyst-ploidy development outcomes with an AUC of 0.71, sensitivity 0.59, specificity 0.70. Subgroup analysis by clinic revealed similar performances across locations; Clinic 1 (n = 1779)—AUC 0.67, sensitivity 0.72, specificity 0.52; Clinic 2 (n = 885)—AUC 0.70, sensitivity 0.60, specificity 0.66; and Clinic 3 (n = 820)—AUC 0.76, sensitivity 0.60, specificity 0.76. Comparing model performance between clinics displayed similar performance on Clinic 1 and Clinic 2 (p = 0.1267, DeLong’s test); however, significantly higher performance on Clinic 3 compared to Clinic 1 and Clinic 2 (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, respectively). Oocytes that developed into euploid blastocysts (n = 1483) had significantly higher median model-predicted euploid probabilities than those that developed into aneuploid blastocysts or failed to develop into a blastocyst (n = 2001) by Mann-Whitney U-test (0.30 vs. 0.19, p < 0.001). Model probabilities in the test set were divided into quartiles (Q1-4) according to model probability distribution. A significant, stepwise increase in true euploid development rate from the mature oocyte stage was observed between each quartile group; Q1 – 156/871 (18%), Q2 – 339/871 (39%), Q3 – 415/871 (48%), Q4 – 573/871 (66%). The proportion of true euploid development within all quartiles was significantly different by pairwise-proportions test with Bonferroni correction (all p < 0.01). Limitations, reasons for caution This dataset contains retrospective data from 3 clinics. Additional data from diverse clinic geographies would potentially add to model generalizability. The model displayed significantly higher performance on Clinic 3, which should be further investigated. A prospective validation study is needed to further confirm the clinical utility of the model. Wider implications of the findings Utilizing analysis from the existing MAGENTA model, a Ploidy AI-model was developed to specifically predict euploid blastocyst development from a mature oocyte. Robust non-invasive analysis of oocytes is achieved by these two models, providing valuable insights into oocyte quality, improving expectation management, and presenting an alternative assessment of genetic integrity. Trial registration number No
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».