Studying The Health Implications Of Metro Rail Or Highway Construction On Local Communities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Considering Indian legislation, this study investigates the frequently disregarded public health effects that metro rail and highway construction have on nearby communities. Populations living close to building sites face a variety of health dangers as India's infrastructure development picks up speed, aided by the country's fast urbanisation and economic expansion. These hazards include exposure to excessive noise and tainted water supplies, mental health problems brought on by relocation, and respiratory ailments brought on by air pollution. Despite these effects, the health risks connected to such massive metropolitan projects are not sufficiently addressed by India's current regulatory framework. In addition to a comparative analysis of international legal frameworks from countries including the US, EU, Australia, and Canada, the analysis includes a thorough evaluation of Indian statutes, pertinent case law, and environmental regulations. These nations' infrastructure planning systems incorporate strong monitoring procedures, public participation procedures, and Health Impact Assessments (HIAs).The results show that health issues are frequently marginalised by India's legal system, which prioritises economic or environmental factors above health issues. The integration of health impact assessments into infrastructure governance is severely lacking in practice. Although the judiciary has been instrumental in establishing the right to health under Article 21, its recognition has not resulted in the implementation of systematic legal protections or enforceable health standards in infrastructure-related projects.The study emphasises how inadequate accountability for health outcomes is caused by the absence of required HIAs, low public engagement, and inadequate post-approval monitoring. This paper highlights the urgent need for reform by critically analysing India's legal and policy shortcomings and comparing it to international best practices. It promotes more community involvement, post-project health audits, and the required inclusion of health impact assessments in the EIA process. In order to institutionalise a more comprehensive and preventive approach to development, it also urges interagency coordination between health departments, urban planners, and legal bodies.The paper makes the case for proactive legal frameworks that incorporate health issues throughout all phases of infrastructure construction, as opposed to reactive ones. In order to achieve inclusive, sustainable, and socially equitable urban expansion in India, public health must be treated as a fundamental legal and ethical concern. In order to bring India's infrastructure governance into line with its constitutional commitment to the right to health, the paper makes specific legislative and policy proposals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».