The effect of alexithymia on functioning and perceived social support after a manic episode
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The effect of alexithymia on functioning and perceived social support after a manic episode B D (bipolar disorder) is a mood disorder characterized by mood swings.The diagnostic criterion for bipolar disorder, previously called manic-depressive disorder, is to have at least one hypomanic or manic attack and at least one major depressive episode, in accordance with the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5 th edition) criteria. [1]Major depressive episodes are associated with symptoms such as a lack of energy, an inability to enjoy life, and an inability to look at the future with hope.On the other hand, manic attacks are characterized by grandiosity, rapid speech, flight of ideas, irritable mood, and risky behaviors. [2]though there is no definitive information about the etiology of bipolar disorder, it is thought that multiple factors are effective.When the research is reviewed, the disruption of chemical balance in the brain, environmental stressors, hereditary factors, childhood traumas, some neurotransmitters, and drugs are considered the most important factors. [2][3][4] Different data are available on the incidence of bipolar disorder, and it is observed at a rate of 1.0% to 3.3% in the world according to the World Health Organization. [5]Together with its subtypes, BD has a lifetime prevalence of up to 7.8%. [6]The recurrence rate of this disease within two years is around 60%. [7,8] There are var- Objectives:The aim of this study was to examine the correlation of alexithymia, functioning, and perceived social support in patients after a manic episode.Methods: Sample selection was not carried out in this descriptive study, and 267 patients who met the inclusion criteria constituted the sample.Data collection was performed via face-to-face interviews using the Personal Information Form, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Bipolar Disorder Functioning Questionnaire (BDFQ), and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS).The data were analyzed using the SPSS program.Results: It was determined that 19.5% (n=52) of the patients included in the study were alexithymic.A significant negative correlation was identified between alexithymia and perceived social support (r=-0.313;p<0.05) and functioning (r=-0.467;p<0.05), and a significant positive correlation was found between functioning and perceived social support (r=0.504; p<0.05).According to linear regression analysis, the alexithymia scores of the participants explained 22% of the variance in their functioning scores (R=0.218,F=73.797, p<0.001, 95% CI: 0.399-0.250),and alexithymia scores explained 10% of the variance in perceived social support scores (R=0.098,F=28.880, p<0.001, 95% CI: 0.308-0.143). Conclusion:This study found that functioning and perceived social support decreased as alexithymia increased in post-manic patients.Functioning and perceived social support affect each other in the same direction.Interventions aimed at reducing alexithymia in patients after manic episodes may be useful in preventing episodes by maintaining functionality and increasing perceived social support.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».