MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411884090 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0314.57

Neurological Behcet’s Disease in an Adolescent: A Case Report

2025· article· en· W4411884090 sur OpenAlexaffvenue
Jeanine McColl, Teresa Liang, Dax G. Rumsey

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineErythema nodosumPathergyBehcet's diseaseRetinal vasculitisVasculitisDermatologyFolliculitisVascular diseaseUveitisDiseaseSurgeryPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Behcet’s disease (BD) is an idiopathic multisystemic inflammatory disease. There are 2 primary sets of diagnostic criteria. The 1990 International Study Group criteria consists of recurrent oral ulcers at least 3 times in 12 months and 2 or more of the following other features: recurrent genital ulcers, eye lesions (uveitis, retinal vasculitis), skin lesions (erythema nodosum, pseudo folliculitis, papulopustular lesions, or acneiform nodules) or a positive pathergy test (skin papule 2 mm or more 24-48 hrs post-needle insertion).[1,2] The 2014 International Criteria for Behcet Disease assigns 2 points for the following: ocular lesions, genital aphthosis, and oral aphthosis and 1 point for each of the following: skin lesions, neurologic manifestations (central and peripheral), and vascular manifestations (arterial and/or venous thrombosis, phlebitis) and a bonus point for a positive pathergy test. Four points or greater is consistent with a diagnosis of Behcet’s disease.[2] The vasculitis of Behcet’s disease is unique in that it can affect vessels of all sizes and may consist of arterial and/or venous involvement.[1] While disease onset is more common in adults 30-40 years of age, it can present in childhood with a mean onset of 12 years old and a 4:1 male predominance.[1,2] Neurological involvement occurs in 5-10% of all BD cases with pediatric-onset neurological involvement being rare at ~4% of all cases of NB.[1] Case We present a case of a 14-year-old Somali male with a history of latent tuberculosis (TB) who presented with 2 episodes of conjunctivitis and left eye blurred vision. He was diagnosed with bilateral pan uveitis and right cystoid macular edema. Workup demonstrated positive HLA-B51 and Toxoplasmosis IgG antibody and he was started on sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim. The previous TB QuantiFERON was positive with negative chest x-ray and TB skin test. Three months later, he presented with acute genital ulcers, lower extremity paresthesia, back pain, urinary retention, headache, and photophobia. The family mentioned he had recurrent episodes of oral ulcers for a year which was not revealed during earlier assessment despite questioning, although there was a language barrier. On exam, there was loss of sensation to bilateral legs with left foot clonus, hyperreflexia bilaterally, and punctate ulcerations to the scrotum. He had an acute altered level of consciousness, apnea, and a paroxysmal event thought to be a seizure treated with lorazepam and required intubation. Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) showed elevated protein and white blood cell count. CSF, blood, and urine cultures were negative. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain demonstrated abnormal restricted diffusion with associated T2/FLAIR hyperintensity to bilateral hippocampi and left greater than right mesial temporal lobes with patchy enhancement on post-gadolinium images (Figure).[1,3] There was no leptomeningeal or pachymeningeal enhancement. Spine MRI demonstrated patchy long segment T2 signal abnormality of the central spinal cord (greater than 2/3 of the area from C7-L5 and from L5-T10) with minimal cord expansion, and patchy enhancement at T6. Findings raised the possibility of atypical non-herpetic viral encephalitis versus transverse myelitis, the images did not have a typical appearance for Behcet’s disease. Given the clinical features, radiographic findings, and HLA-B51 positivity, he was diagnosed with neurological Behcet’s (NB). Given the seizure, he was started on Levetiracetam for a 6-month course. He had significant neuropathic pain, and was treated with pregabalin and a ketamine infusion, which was eventually discontinued. He received IV methylprednisolone, infliximab, and transitioned to oral steroids. Prophylactic sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were continued given the history of toxoplasmosis. He did not require prophylaxis for TB. He was transferred to a rehabilitation hospital for ongoing rehabilitation and subsequently discharged home. Repeat imagining demonstrated resolution of the lesions after treatment. Informed written consent for this case report was obtained. Conclusion Behcet’s can present with neurological features secondary to parenchymal, spinal cord, or brain vasculature involvement. CVST and ICHTN are more common in pediatric populations.[3] This case is unique in that it illustrates that children can present with hippocampal parenchymal and spinal cord involvement. Physicians should consider NB in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with altered level of consciousness or seizures. [1.] Uluduz D. Neurology 2011;77(21):1900-5. [2.] Borhani-Haghighi A. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders 2020;39:101906. [3.] Saadoun D. Arthritis Rheum 2009;61(4):518-26.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,302
Écart entre enseignants0,285 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of RheumatologyMême sujetOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeTravaux en français237 207