MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4411889179 · doi:10.3390/jcdd12070253

The Prognostic Potential of Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 1 for Cardiovascular Complications in Peripheral Artery Disease

2025· article· en· W4411889179 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesBlair Foundation
Mots-clésPeripheralArterial diseaseMedicineDiseaseInternal medicineInsulinDiabetes mellitusCardiologyInsulin-like growth factorCoronary artery diseaseVascular diseaseInsulin-like growth factor-binding proteinGrowth factorEndocrinologyReceptor

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) have a heightened risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Despite this, limited progress has been made in identifying reliable biomarkers to prognosticate such outcomes. Circulating growth factors, known to influence endothelial function and the progression of atherosclerosis, may hold prognostic value in this context. The objective of this research was to evaluate a broad range of blood-based growth factors to investigate their potential as predictors of MACE in patients diagnosed with PAD. Methods: A total of 465 patients with PAD were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Baseline plasma levels of five different growth factors were measured, and participants were monitored over a two-year period. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MACE within those two years. Comparative analysis of protein levels between patients who did and did not experience MACE was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test. To assess the individual prognostic significance of each protein for predicting MACE within two years, Cox proportional hazards regression was performed, adjusting for clinical and demographic factors including a history of coronary and cerebrovascular disease. Subgroup analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of these proteins in females, who may be at higher risk of PAD-related adverse events. Net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated to assess the added value of significant biomarkers to model performance for predicting 2-year MACE when compared to using demographic/clinical features alone. Kaplan–Meier curves stratified by IGFBP-1 tertiles compared using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to assess 2-year MACE risk trajectory based on plasma protein levels. Results: The average participant age was 71 years (SD 10); 31.1% were female and 47.2% had diabetes. By the end of the two-year follow-up, 18.1% (n = 84) had experienced MACE. Of all proteins studied, only insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) showed a significant elevation among patients who suffered MACE versus those who remained event-free (20.66 [SD 3.91] vs. 13.94 [SD 3.80] pg/mL; p = 0.012). IGFBP-1 remained a significant independent predictor of 2-year MACE occurrence in the multivariable Cox analysis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.21–1.97; p = 0.012). Subgroup analyses revealed that IGFBP-1 was significantly associated with 2-year MACE occurrence in both females (adjusted HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.16–1.97; p = 0.015) and males (adjusted HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.22; p = 0.045). Incorporating IGFBP-1 into the clinical risk prediction model significantly enhanced its predictive performance, with an increase in the AUROC from 0.73 (95% CI 0.71–0.75) to 0.79 (95% CI 0.77–0.81; p = 0.01), an NRI of 0.21 (95% CI 0.07–0.36; p = 0.014), and an IDI of 0.041 (95% CI 0.015–0.066; p = 0.008), highlighting the prognostic value of IGFBP-1. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed an increase in the cumulative incidence of 2-year MACE across IGFBP-1 tertiles. Patients in the highest IGFBP-1 tertile experienced a significantly higher event rate compared to those in the lowest tertile (log-rank p = 0.008). In the Cox proportional hazards analysis, the highest tertile of IGFBP-1 was associated with increased 2-year MACE risk compared to the lowest tertile (adjusted HR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.31–2.65; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Among the growth factors analyzed, IGFBP-1 emerged as the sole biomarker independently linked to the development of MACE over a two-year span in both female and male PAD patients. The addition of IGFBP-1 to clinical features significantly improved model predictive performance for 2-year MACE. Measuring IGFBP-1 levels may enhance risk stratification and guide the intensity of therapeutic interventions and referrals to cardiovascular specialists, ultimately supporting more personalized and effective management strategies for patients with PAD to reduce systemic vascular risk.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,281
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,770

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,218 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle