Enhancing protection against vector-borne diseases in forcibly displaced communities: evaluating the efficacy of spatial repellents for cutaneous leishmaniasis control in North-East Syria
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: In Syria, during the 14 years after the outbreak of civil war, 16.7 million people have been forced to flee their homes, of which 7.2 million remain internally displaced in 2025. Breakdown in waste management caused by aerial bombardment has created ideal conditions for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) transmission, vectored by phlebotomine sandflies. Displaced populations reside in flimsy shelters where conventional vector control tools are operationally unfeasible. A small, lightweight, portable transfluthrin-based spatial repellent (Mosquito Shield™) has been developed which may circumvent some of these logistical issues and provide improved protection from vector-borne diseases in harsh environments. METHODS: A two-arm, non-randomised cluster trial was undertaken in Ar-Raqqa governorate, North-East Syria, to evaluate the efficacy of Mosquito Shield™ in reducing CL case incidence and sandfly densities in shelters. Weekly epidemiological monitoring was performed by MENTOR Initiative mobile clinics and supported health facilities. Entomological monitoring was performed fortnightly using indoor US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention light traps in 40 randomly selected households per study arm. Phlebotomine sandflies were morphologically identified; a subset were analysed for molecular species confirmation, blood-meal preferences and pyrethroid resistance. Household surveys and focus group discussions were used to assess intervention feasibility, acceptability and uptake. RESULTS: Assuming a 2-month diagnosis cut-off, the CL incidence rate was 9.9 and 5.2 per 1000 in the control and intervention arms, respectively; Mosquito Shield™ demonstrated a significant impact on rate of CL infection in all ages (incidence rate ratio; IRR: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.37-0.74]; p < 0.0001). Mosquito Shield™ demonstrated a significant impact on all female sandfly density (IRR: 0.22 [95% CI: 0.14-0.33]; p < 0.0001) and blood-fed female sandfly density (IRR: 0.21 [95% CI: 0.11-0.40]; p < 0.0001). Mosquito Shield™ was received positively and perceived to be easy to use, to protect from CL, sandflies and other insect bites and required minimal behaviour change. CONCLUSIONS: Trial findings provide the first demonstrable impact of spatial repellents on CL transmission, strengthening the growing evidence basis for the effectiveness of this intervention against multiple vector species and their associated pathogens. Study results strongly support the deployment of spatial repellents to control CL in humanitarian crises. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06917040.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».