Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction For over a century, the electrocardiogram (ECG) has been a cornerstone of cardiovascular diagnostics—offering a noninvasive, accessible, and rapid assessment of cardiac electrical activity. It remains vital in detecting arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, conduction abnormalities, and structural heart diseases. Yet, its interpretation has traditionally depended on clinician expertise, which can lead to inconsistent accuracy.[ 1 ] [ 2 ] Studies reveal that nearly one-third of ECG readings contain major errors. A 2020 meta-analysis found a median interpretation accuracy of only 54% among physicians, rising modestly to 67% after educational interventions. These persistent gaps highlight the limitations of human interpretation despite training efforts.[ 3 ] Such challenges have fueled interest in more advanced solutions. [ Table 1 ] contrasts traditional ECG interpretation with artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches in terms of accuracy, scalability, and clinical relevance. The need for automated ECG analysis is particularly pressing in low- and middle-income countries, where over 75% of global cardiovascular deaths occur and access to expert cardiologists is limited.[ 4 ] Table 1 Comparison of traditional versus AI-driven ECG interpretation Feature Traditional ECG analysis AI-driven ECG analysis Interpretation speed Minutes to hours Seconds Interobserver variability High Minimal Diagnostic accuracy Depends on clinician expertise High (if trained on robust data) Detection of subtle abnormalities Limited Enhanced sensitivity Continuous monitoring Not feasible Enabled with wearable AI devices Abbreviations; AI, artificial intelligence; ECG, electrocardiogram. Recent advances in AI, especially deep learning, are reshaping ECG analysis. AI algorithms can process vast data sets, detect subtle patterns beyond human perception, and deliver highly accurate predictive insights. These tools have demonstrated promise in diagnosing latent or asymptomatic conditions such as left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and cardiac amyloidosis (CA)—often before symptoms emerge ([ Table 2 ]). Table 2 Current AI applications in ECG and their clinical utility AI application Clinical utility/Significance Arrhythmia detection (e.g., AFib, VT, PVCs) Improves diagnostic accuracy and early detection of arrhythmias often in asymptomatic patients. Enables timely intervention and reduces stroke risk ECG interpretation assistance Enhances efficiency and consistency in reading ECGs, especially in high-volume settings. Reduces interobserver variability Prediction of left ventricular dysfunction AI models can detect reduced ejection fraction (e.g., LVEF < 40%) from surface ECGs alone, facilitating early heart failure diagnosis even before symptoms or echo abnormalities appear Detection of silent myocardial ischemia or infarction AI-enhanced ECG can identify subtle patterns indicative of ischemia or prior MI not recognized by standard interpretation, especially useful in diabetics or atypical cases Hyperkalemia or hypokalemia prediction Detects electrolyte disturbances from ECG patterns before lab confirmation, allowing quicker clinical decision-making Risk stratification (e.g., sudden cardiac death, AFib recurrence) Identifies patients at higher risk for adverse events and guides monitoring or therapy escalation. For example, predicting need for ICD in nonischemic cardiomyopathy Disease screening in asymptomatic populations Facilitates mass screening for conditions like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, AFib, or heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF) Remote monitoring and wearable integration AI enables continuous rhythm monitoring from smartwatches or patches, filtering noise and detecting actionable events with high accuracy Early detection of noncardiac conditions Emerging use of AI to predict conditions like sleep apnea, anemia, and even COVID-19 through ECG pattern analysis Abbreviations; AFib, atrial fibrillation; AI, artificial intelligence; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; ECG, electrocardiogram; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; PVC, premature ventricular contraction; VT, ventricular tachycardia. AI, particularly machine learning and deep neural networks, is rapidly becoming a transformative force in cardiology. The following sections explore key clinical applications where AI-enhanced ECG has shown significant diagnostic and prognostic value.[ 5 ] [ 6 ] Financial Support None. Publication History Received: 27 April 2025 Accepted: 11 May 2025 Article published online: 03 July 2025 © 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».