MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412005960 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1621802

Editorial: Craniofacial neuroscience

2025· editorial· en· W4412005960 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alyssa Huff, Teresa Pitts

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Neurology · 2025
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMedical and Biological Sciences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeurosciencePsychologyCraniofacialCognitive neuroscienceCognitive scienceMedicineCognitionPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Upper airway dysfunction continues to be detailed in a number of neurodegenerative and neurotraumatic diseases. Song et al. reports the prevalence of post stroke dysphagia is 47% with associated risk factors such as hypertension, previous stroke, and atrial fibrillation. The authors also reported the persistence of dysphagia at discharge and 1 month post to be 75% and 51%, respectively. Martinez-Peña et al. also reported a high prevalence of dysphagia in older individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Suggesting early identification and intervention is key in preventing serious health outcomes. Liu et al. reports the association of lower income levels with increased oropharyngeal dysphagia, highlighting the complex challenges of health care accessibility, nutritional adequacy and stress. The authors also call for a sex-specific approach in early intervention in the aging population.Preclinical animal models are investigating a number of potential mechanisms for dysphagia and upper airway dysfunction. Motoneuron (MN) death associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) disrupts orolingual and aerodigestive behaviors such as speech and swallowing, as well as ventilatory and non-ventilatory behaviors, breathing and coughing, respectively. These deficits also result in an increased risk of airway protection and aspiration pneumonia. By using a mouse model of ALS, Fogarty et al. investigated a timeline for sizedependent XII MN loss and tongue innervation in SOD1 mice. They saw a significant reduction in larger XII MN at mid-and end-stage disease with no difference at presymptomatic and onset ages. Specific disruption to tongue neuromuscular junctions did not occur until end-stage timepoints leading the authors to the conclusion that denervation of tongue neuromuscular junctions may be a consequence not a cause of MN deficits in SOD1 mice. While Keilholz et al. used a different rodent model to induce XII MN death and investigated the use of strength endurance tongue exercise program as a potential therapy for patients with motoneuron disease and ALS. They found that tongue exercise mitigated airflow deficits and preserved the upper airway and ultrafine structures in the tongue, suggesting that high-repetition low endurance tongue exercise program could be an effective therapeutic to maintain upper airway patency.Persons with Down Syndrome experience dysphagia across all three swallow phases: oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal, likely due to disordered tongue function, uncoordinated swallow and breathing, and esophageal dysmotility. Glass et al. utilized clinical techniques in a mouse model of Down Syndrome (Ts65Dn). They found that adult Ts65Dn mice have significantly slower swallow rates and longer time intervals between consecutive swallows. Adult Ts65Dn mice also have slower rates of developing tongue force and a more rapid onset of tongue muscle fatigue. Conclud ing that heightened susceptibility to tongue muscle fatigue could contribute to increased duration of the oral phase and decrease the efficacy of deglutition (swallowing).Opioids, specifically morphine and remifentanil, use has been associated with aspiration and swallow dysfunction. However, the influence of codeine, the most abused opioid drug worldwide, on swallowing is unknown. Bolser et al. reported that intravenous codeine induced spontaneous swallowing in vagal intact and vagally denervated cats, suggesting that swallowpromoting actions of this drug do not require sensory feedback from the vagus to occur. Though there was an increase in the amplitude of upper airway muscles during water induced swallows, swallow frequency did not change. This continues to support the concept that swallow frequency and swallow amplitude are independently regulated.While swallowing is thought to predominately be controlled by the brainstem, there is strong evidence the spinal cord also plays an important role. Kitamura et al. utilized Gaussian frequency stimulation applied to the skin surface of the back over the ribs in a rodent model to activate sensory spinal pathways as a possible therapeutic to improve swallow activity. Stimulation at the T9-T10 level significantly increased swallow related muscle amplitudes of the mylohyoid, thyroarytenoid, and thyropharyngeus. The mylohyoid is a laryngeal elevator muscle, while the thyropharyngeus is a pharyngeal constrictor muscle crucial for swallow related bolus transfer. The thyroarytenoid is a laryngeal adductor muscles that activates during swallow to close the airway and prevent food or liquid from entering. Hashimoto et al. sought to develop a new dysphagia model with reduced pharyngeal constriction during the pharyngeal phase of swallow in a guinea pig. Denervation of the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve significantly impacted the expiratory and swallow related activity of the thyropharyngeus and disrupted swallow function one month after injury. This new experimental model could provide insight into dysphagia therapeutic development and mechanisms associated with cranial nerve injury, reinnervation, and regeneration. The motor neurons that regulate these pharyngeal and laryngeal muscles are located within the nucleus ambiguus. M Fogarty et al. characterized the dendritic morphology of the MNs and non-MNs within the compact, semi-compact, and loose formation of the nucleus ambiguus in the brainstem. These findings introduce valuable insight into the inter-network connection of these neurons that must coordinate for proper swallow function.Beyond ingestion, the trigeminal nerve is responsible for both sensory and motor functions of the face, by providing motor innervation to the muscles of mastication and sensory feedback from the jaws and teeth. The mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus, a key portion of the CN V, is activated during bruxism, which is the repetitive clenching or grinding of the teeth. This behavior can occur during awake and sleep states and affects up to 30% of the population. Uchima Koecklin et al. described the current understanding of brain regions and neurotransmitters involved in bruxism, as well as psychological traits and clinical implications. The authors encourage continued animal and human studies on bruxism, specifically the trigeminal system, to improve treatment approaches and understanding of this multifactorial condition. In dental procedures, damage to branches of the trigeminal nerve (inferior alveolar nerve and lingual nerve) are often the major complications following lower jaw surgeries and 3 rd molar extractions and can lead to temporary and/or permanent numbness in the lower lip and tongue.Facial Palsy refers to weakness or paralysis of the facial muscles caused by damage to the facial nerve. While facial synkinesis is a complication that can develop after facial palsy which refers to involuntary simultaneous movements of the facial muscles. These conditions can affect facial expressions, eating, drinking, speech, and eye closure, hindering daily activities and quality of life. Machetanz et al. draws attention to the lack of specialized treatment options for facial palsy and how the vast number of specialists required to treat facial palsy contributes to treatment satisfaction and quality of life. Di Stadio et al. presented the idea of pairing physical facial nerve rehabilitation with early lower eyelid surgery to improve or prevent synkinesis. They reported that patients that underwent eyelid surgery along with physical facial nerve rehabilitation had faster and better recovery of facial movements, along with no synkinesis even 24 months after surgery. Whereas 37% of patients who did not have surgery and only participated in physical facial nerve rehabilitation developed synkinesis.While the primary focus of craniofacial neuroscience research is to support the understanding of human populations, our knowledge is extremely valuable in the rehabilitation of other species including harbor seals. Thousands of infant harbor seals have been admitted to the Vancouver Aquarium's Marine Mammal Rescue center and other rehabilitation centers world wild. The primary cause of death in seal pups is malnutrition and in adults, pneumonia. Skoretz et al. describes the novel ability to use clinical Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies (VFSS) in seal pups to identify 4 distinct swallow phases, vastly expanding the understanding of airway protection in independently feeding seals.This collection of articles draws attention to the wide variety of specialties associated with all 12 cranial nerves across many different behaviors and disorders. Continued collaboration in both the basic science and clinical sciences are necessary to improve our understanding of craniofacial neuroscience.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,059
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,198

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0030,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0100,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0590,036

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,272
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Neurology→Même sujetMedical and Biological Sciences→Travaux en français237 207→