Past, present and future challenges in mountain transhumance
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This book, through historical and forward-looking analysis carried out across various study sites by around fifty researchers and stakeholders involved in Mountain Transhumance, aims to anticipate the major changes and challenges facing this pastoral activity, in order to inform policymakers at the local, regional, national, and even global levels. The findings presented in this book are based on research conducted in the early 2020s across twenty case studies on four continents: Asia (Qilian Mountains in the northeast of the Tibetan Plateau, China; Kazakhstan; and Mount Lebanon), Africa (Green Mountains in Libya; Eastern Atlas in Algeria; High Atlas in Morocco; Tigray in northern Ethiopia; and Kamiesberg Mountains in South Africa), Americas (Canadian Rockies; Chimborazo Watershed in Ecuador; Cordillera Blanca and Altiplano in Peru; Malargüe and Southern Patagonian Andes in Argentina), and Europe (Serra da Estrela in Portugal; Cévennes and Upper Tarentaise/Alps in France; Pindos Mountains in Greece; Romania; and Scandinavian Alps in Norway). From a methodological standpoint, the research sought to combine approaches from the human and social sciences—particularly interviews and text analysis involving stakeholders recommended by local transhumance actors—with tools from life and natural sciences, such as forage balance assessments and factorial analyses. In terms of results, the research confirmed and refined the key functions of transhumance, which were found in nearly all the case studies. These functions—listed in no particular order—include: i) making use of a seasonal pastoral resource essential to the forage balance of herds, while maintaining landscapes across altitudinal gradients (one of the key ecosystem services provided by livestock farming); ii) freeing up labour for other important agricultural tasks while protecting cultivated areas from grazing; iii) strengthening food security and livelihoods for pastoral families, villages, and mountain regions; iv) preserving skills and providing remunerative employment opportunities for both young and older generations; v) maintaining social networks and relationships among pastoral communities on opposite sides of the same mountain—networks that support not only tourism development, but also, as in the past, the exchange of techniques, practices, equipment, and genetic material; and more. Another major finding, consistent across most case studies, is the critical role of public policy at the local and territorial levels. Moreover, addressing the immense challenges posed by climate change is a significant issue in most study areas. This is particularly due to the uncertainty surrounding climate evolution and local policy decisions, both of which strongly affect pastoral resource management and the lives of families and communities. Climate change intensifies the uncertainty that pastoral systems have always faced, and it exacerbates the effects of market price volatility, which these systems must increasingly learn to navigate.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».