An Observational Study on the Use of Manual Muscle Testing for Dietary Elimination in Food Sensitivity-Related Conditions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Adverse food reactions are a highly prevalent concern, manifesting in a diverse range of gastrointestinal, cutaneous, and, respiratory symptoms. The accurate determination of food sensitivity (FS) therefore of considerable importance in the effective management of associated symptomatology. Manual muscle testing (MMT), a non-invasive diagnostic technique, is employed to identify physiological imbalances or areas of tenderness by assessing muscular responsiveness. However, t utility of MMT in identifying food sensitivities has not been sufficiently investigated in the existing scientific literature. Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of an elimination diet, guided by MMT findings, in providing symptomatic relief for issues associated with food sensitivity. Patients and Methods: Individuals with asthma, atopic dermatitis, dyspepsia, fibromyalgia, and low-back pain were enrolled in this study. Food sensitivities, to a panel of 81 food items were determined using MMT. A total of 152 participants were recruited, comprising, comprising 100 individuals assigned to the diet intervention group and 52 to the control group. Participants in the diet group adhered to an elimination diet for 30 days, formulated based on their individual MMT results. Outcome measures included the Short Form-36 Quality of Life Scale, along with disease-specific instruments administered via a face-to-face questionnaire: the Asthma Control Test, Dyspepsia Severity Scale, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, Quebec Low Back Disability Scale, and Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27. Results: A statistically significant improvement in Quality of Life (QoL) was observed in the intervention group following the dietary intervention (p < 0.01). The elimination diet improved scores across various disease-specific instruments: Asthma Control Test (from 13.6 ± 4.3 to 19.2 ± 4.3, p < 0.01), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (from 15.4 ± 7.4 to 5.0 ± 5.2, p < 0.01), Dyspepsia Severity Scale; Pain Intensity (from 22.6 ± 10.9 to 6.2 ± 10.7), Non-Pain Symptoms (from 18.7 ± 4.4 to 11.0 ± 4.3), and Satisfaction (from 11.7 ± 2.0 to 13.0 ± 1.6) (p < 0.01). Significant improvements were also noted in Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire scores (from 55.1 ± 19.5 to 30.5 ± 19.5, p<0.01) and Quebec Low Back Disability Scale scores (from 19.2 ± 16.4 to 11.6 ± 9.6, p < 0.01). Conclusions: The present study indicates that an elimination diet based on MMT results may contribute to the alleviation of food sensitivity-related symptoms. While MMT appears to be a promising method for identifying food sensitivities, further rigorous investigations are warranted to fully establish its diagnostic utility. Keywords: Applied kinesiology, Manual muscle testing, Elimination diet, Nutrition, Food sensitivity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».