Roads of restoration and resilience: A journey into clitoral restoration surgery in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
,Female genital cutting (FGC) has a profound impact on the physical, mental, and sexual health of survivors - leading to various long-term health complications overtime. Clitoral restoration surgery (CRS) has emerged as a potential solution to these complications through the surgery’s acclaimed ability to alleviate pain, restore sexual function, and improve survivors’ sense of self. However, these claims have been challenged, highlighting insufficient evidence and lack of consideration for the psychosexual and cultural contexts that influence survivors’ surgical outcomes. Therefore, understanding FGC as an ongoing experience rather than a onetime event emphasizes the complexity of its effects on survivors. In order to account for this complexity, this study employs a combination of theoretical perspectives, including complexity theory, intersectional feminist theory, and multisystemic resilience. These frameworks help to investigate questions of Canadian survivors’ motivations in electing to undergo CRS, the specific complications they must present with in order to qualify for this surgical procedure, and physicians’ decision-making when it comes to identifying potential candidates. Through survivors, care providers, and FGC-related organizations, this study explores these questions. By examining the decision-making process between physician and their patient, this study emphasizes the importance of individualized care that accounts for survivors’ unique physical, social, and cultural contexts. Additionally, this research underscores the importance of more holistic treatment options, such as psychosexual therapy and sexual education, as potential alternatives to CRS. These approaches may help to address survivors’ health concerns without the need for surgical intervention. By promoting awareness of these alternatives, the study encourages a more comprehensive understanding of healing that moves beyond physical health to also emphasize survivors’ mental and emotional well-being along their healing journeys. Lastly, by contributing to the limited body of knowledge on CRS and FGC-related care more broadly in Canada, this research helps to raise awareness of the challenges faced by survivors, combat stigma in health-care settings, and support the development of relevant health policies. Insights gained from survivors, care providers, and FGC-related organizations in this study highlight the interconnectedness of these groups - fostering collaborative efforts to improve survivor care and support services in both Canada and abroad.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».