Children's Communication Choices About Musculoskeletal Pain and Injury: Insights From a Public Involvement Event
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION: Musculoskeletal pain and injury are common in childhood. To assess and manage children's pain appropriately, it is crucial to understand their perspective on how the problem started and how it feels. There are multiple barriers to children being heard. Offering visual-based communication opportunities, in addition to traditional language-based communication, could potentially help children to retell their experiences. The aim of the public involvement event was to establish how children chose to retell their experience of musculoskeletal pain or injury. METHOD: As part of the preliminary work for the design of a clinical intervention, children's opinions were sought at a public event. An interactive exhibit invited children to retell their musculoskeletal pain and injury experiences through talking, drawing, acting, writing, using a human figurine, or combining these methods. Observation and note-taking were used by exhibit facilitators to record how children chose to retell their experience. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve children aged 2-17 years participated in the interactive exhibit. Most children choose to use a creative activity in addition to talking about their experience. Drawing or using a human figurine was the most frequently used creative activity. Creative methods, most often drawing, enabled some children to communicate their pain experience without talking. Age and gender differences were observed, with younger children being more likely to draw and boys using human figurines more often. CONCLUSION: There was no 'one size fits all' approach to communication as children had different preferences. The most frequently used creative methods, drawing and the use of a human figurine, will inform the design of a tailored physiotherapy intervention developed with service users. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This public involvement event highlights the valuable role children can play in shaping research processes to inform the development of interventions. The broader research programme, including this event, was supported by the University Faculty of Medicine Youth Advisory Group, comprising nine members aged 14-18, who actively contributed by helping to determine the methods used, during two 1-h sessions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The wider programme of research about which public involvement was informed is registered and listed on the ISRCTN registry, with study registration number ISRCTN18918987.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».