MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412120640 · doi:10.5194/epsc-dps2025-643

Experimental study of the interference dips observed on the collision-induced absorption fundamental band of H2: their relevance to planetary atmosphere characterization

2025· preprint· en· W4412120640 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesca Vitali, Stefania Stefani, G. Piccioni, Marcel Snels, D. Grassi, David Biondi, A. Boccaccini

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAtmosphere (unit)Characterization (materials science)CollisionInterference (communication)Relevance (law)Absorption (acoustics)AstrobiologyPhysicsAstrophysicsEnvironmental scienceTelecommunicationsOpticsMeteorologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceComputer security

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: The atmospheres of the gaseous and icy giant planets represent a high-density environment whose composition is generally dominated by H2 and He.Consequently, the H2 Collision-Induced Absorption (CIA) represents one of the main opacity sources in the near-infrared spectral range between 1 and 5 μm. This is a spectral range widely investigated for Jupiter not only by ground-based instruments, but also from space, presently through the eyes of JIRAM on board JUNO, JWST, and in future also of MAJIS on board JUICE.Jupiter, in fact, represents an archetype for the giants’ gaseous planets, and the understanding of its magnetosphere, composition, and opacity of its dense and complex atmosphere are all important elements for the most comprehensive view about how the Jupiter system(s) works.In this work, we performed an experimental study of the H2 CIA in the [3600, 5500] cm-1 spectral range at high resolution, to investigate not only the overall opacity due to the CIA, but also to study the narrow features called interference dips, not taken into account by the existing models.Experimental setup: The experimental setup employed here is called PASSxS (Planetary Atmosphere Simulation System x Spectroscopy) [1]. It consists of a simulation chamber that contains a Multi-Pass cell coupled with an IR Fourier spectrometer (FTIR) and aligned to reach an optical path of 3.28 m. The chamber can be heated up to 550 K, cooled down to 100 K, and sustain pressures up to 70 bar. The FTIR has a maximum spectral resolution of 0.002 cm-1.A picture of the setup can be visualized in Figure 1.Figure 1: Experimental setup, consisting of a Fourier Spectrometer coupled with a simulation chamber (in grey behind the FTIR)Results and discussion: Binary absorption coefficients due to both the H2-H2 and H2-He collisions in the [3600, 5500] cm-1 spectral range for temperatures going from 120 to 500 K has been recently published in [2]. Superimposed on the CIA absorption, some narrow features have been observed at all the temperatures. These interference dips correspond with a smaller absorption at specific frequencies with respect to the overall CIA band contour.They have been previously observed in other experimental works [3-7] at temperatures up to 300 K. To study the behavior of those features with density and temperature, we performed measurements of the H2 CIA fundamental band at a resolution of 0.05 cm-1, temperatures from 305 to 499 K, and different pressures.Figure 2 shows the measured absorption coefficients for three pressures at 399 K.Figure 2: Experimental absorption coefficients measured at 399 K for three different pressuresThe interference dips are well visible on the left side of the main peak of the band.Furthermore, they are also present around 4161 cm-1, 4500 cm-1, 4700 cm-1, and 4900 cm-1, but the latter three are superimposed on several sharp absorption lines due to the H2 quadrupolar transitions, located approximately in the centre of the dips. The phenomenon generating those dips has been previously investigated by Van Kranendonk [8]. They are caused by the interference of induced dipole moments in consecutive collisions and are not reproduced by the existing CIA model simulations.Van Kranendonk calculated a symmetric theoretical profile to describe their shape as a function of the intracollisional halfwidth δ and the frequency of the dip’s peak νc.He also predicted a linear behavior of the intracollisional halfwidth with density.However, Kelley and Bragg [5] observed an asymmetry of the main peak of the dips. Consequently, they used a modified version of Van Kranendonk’s profile by adding a phase α to fit the asymmetric line profiles as shown Equation 1.Equation 1: Asymmetric profile [5]We used their profile to fit the Q(1) dip near 4155 cm-1 for all the pressures considered at the investigated temperatures and retrieve the δ parameter.Figure 3 shows the fit performed over the Q(1) dip measured at 12.7 bar and 399 K.Figure 3: Q(1) interference dip (black solid line) measured at 399 K and 12.7 bar. The light blue dotted line represents the fit made with the asymmetric profile [4].The intracollisional halfwidth has been then plotted against the density, finding a linear behavior for all three temperatures considered, 305 K, 399 K, and 499 K, as can be seen in Figure 4, as expected by Van Kranendonk's theory.Figure 4: Behavior of the intracollisional halfwidth (δ) with density for the three temperatures consideredCIA of H2 plays an important role in investigating Jupiter’s atmosphere, and accurate laboratory measurements along with models are of primary importance to study the chemistry and physical properties of a gas giant atmosphere.Laboratory data can also potentially provide additional elements, such as the dependence of the interference dips on density, that can extend the retrieval of atmospheric parameters otherwise difficult to access.References:[1] M. Snels et al. (2021), AMT 14, 7187–7197,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7187-2021.[2] Vitali F. et al. (2025), JQSRT, Vol. 330, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.109255[3] J. D. Poll et al (1975), Can. J. Phys., 53, 954[4] A. R. McKellar et al. (1975), Can. J. Phys., 53, 2060[5] J. D. Kelley et al. (1984), Phys. Rev. A, 29, 1168[6] J. P. Bouanich et al. (1990), JQSRT, 44, 4[7] J. Westberg et al. (2025), Optics Express, 33, 5[8] Van Kranendonk J. (1968), Canadian Journal of Physics, Vol. 46 N.10,doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/p68-150Acknowledgments: This work has been developed under the ASI-INAF agreement n. 2023-6-HH.0. The upgrade (in progress) of this experimental setup is partially funded by the EMM (Earth Moon Mars) project of PNRR (task 1500-13).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,247
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→Travaux en français237 207→