MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412121882 · doi:10.5194/epsc-dps2025-1536

Coupled formation of a depleted deep mantle reservoir and a basal magma ocean in rocky planets.

2025· preprint· en· W4412121882 sur OpenAlexaff
Laura Lark, Charles‐Édouard Boukaré, James Badro, Henri Samuel

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueGeological Studies and Exploration
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeologyMantle (geology)AstrobiologyPlanetMagmaPetrologyGeochemistryEarth scienceVolcanoAstronomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Energy from accretion, differentiation, and short-lived radionuclides likely caused large-scale melting of terrestrial planets (Elkins-Tanton, 2012; Abe, 1997) and rocky exo-planets (Stixrude, 2014). Differentiation of these “magma oceans” through melt-crystal chemical fractionation combined with physical separation drives the formation of large-scale chemical and density heterogeneity in planetary mantles. Dense material, which tends to be enriched in iron, heat-producing elements (HPE), trace elements, and perhaps volatiles, sinks to the core-mantle boundary (CMB). For Earth, this likely led to the gradual, stable chemical stratification of the deep solid mantle (Ballmer et al., 2017) as well as the formation of a basal magma ocean enriched in iron and HPE (Boukaré et al., 2025). Similar stratification following differentiation has been hypothesized for the Moon (Hess and Parmentier, 1995) and Mars (Samuel et al., 2021; Day et al., 2024).Mantle heterogeneity following magma ocean solidification has lifelong consequences for planetary geological evolution. For example, HPE-rich layers at the CMB suppress core cooling (or leads to core top-heating) while enhancing mantle cooling by isolating the mantle from core heat, which makes the co-occurrence of volcanism (outgassing, availability of fresh nutrients) and magnetic field generation (shielding of the surface from stellar radiation) unlikely (Lark et al, 2024). Furthermore, deep stratification blocks transport between the deeper planet and the surface, trapping volatiles or trace elements and chemically/thermally decoupling the deep and shallow planet. Therefore, the persistence of deep chemical stratification is extremely relevant to both the geological and biological evolution of rocky planets.We explore the geodynamic evolution of a chemically stratified deep mantle bottom-heated by an enriched basal magma ocean numerically using the geodynamic code Bambari, which incorporates melting and melt-crystal chemical fractionation as well as density-driven Stokes flow of the bulk material and percolation of the melt (Boukaré et al., 2025).We find that for Earth-like planets, bottom-heating drives erasure of stratification in two endmember regimes; one in which melt-rich plumes stir the stratified region, and one in which drainage of fractional melts in the boundary layer leads to chemical plumes of depleted material, removing the dense stratifying component to the BMO (Figure 1). The timescale of erasure can be estimated based on the concept of a buoyancy deficit (compositional stratification) and a buoyancy source (heat delivery + heat-density relationship), similar to what has been described for simple thermal expansion (Alley and Parmentier, 1998). The regime can be determined by balancing the timescale of erasure with the melt percolation timescale.For typical planetary physical properties, notably melt viscosity and grain size, Earth should be in the drainage regime. Therefore, if Earth had a gradually stratified layer in its deep mantle, bottom-heating by plausible radioactive heat production and core secular cooling would cause drainage of the dense enriched component (FeO+trace elements) downward to the growing basal magma ocean. This process would have left Earth’s mantle with a depleted deep reservoir that is only slightly denser than the shallow mantle, as well as a thick, enriched basal magma ocean. The solid reservoirs will be far more similar in density than if the stratified region had simply mixed, facilitating their mixing by entrainment so that this residual solid reservoir plausibly does not insulate the core or stratify the mantle long-term.The drainage mechanism which depletes a stratified deep mantle to a basal magma ocean is not directly sensitive to planet size, but depends on several pressure-dependent and composition-dependent quantities. For example, the mechanism depends on fractional melt density, which is lower at lower pressure or with an iron-poorer bulk composition, changing the conditions under which negatively buoyant melts are produced.As another example, regardless of regime, stratification erasure requires the delivery of adequate heat. For Earth, this corresponds to ~2% of its total radioactive budget or a few hundred degrees of core secular cooling; we expect this quantity to be available over at most a few hundred million years. However, in planets with small core fractions and low abundances of radioactive isotopes, this quantity of heat may be unavailable. Similarly, for super-Earths, the diverging adiabat and solidus as well as the decreasing thermal expansivity with pressure predict an era of highly inefficient and likely incomplete mixing by thermal double diffusive convection. In these cases, the stratification will remain much longer-term, locking the material in the deep mantle and isolating the shallow mantle from the deeper planet, with implications for its geological and biological evolution.Figure 1. (left) Numerical setup and (right) snapshots of FeO field showing progression of erasure of stratification through stirring by melt-rich plumes (top) and drainage of FeO-rich fractional melts to the BMO (bottom). ReferencesAbe, Y. (1997). Phys Earth Planet Inter, 100(1-4), 27-39.Alley, K. M., & Parmentier, E. M. (1998). Phys Earth Planet Inter, 108(1), 15-32.Ballmer, M. D., Lourenço, D. L., Hirose, K., Caracas, R., & Nomura, R. (2017). Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 18(7), 2785-2806.Boukaré, C. É., Badro, J., & Samuel, H. (2025). Nature, 1-6.Day, J. M., Paquet, M., Udry, A., & Moynier, F. (2024). Sci Adv, 10(22), eadn9830.Elkins-Tanton, L. T. (2012). Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci, 40(1), 113-139.Hess, P. C., & Parmentier, E. M. (1995). EPSL, 134(3-4), 501-514.Lark, L. H., Huber, C., Parmentier, E. M., & Head, J. W. (2024). JGR: Planets, 129(11), e2024JE008361.Samuel, H., Ballmer, M. D., Padovan, S., Tosi, N., Rivoldini, A., & Plesa, A. C. (2021). JGR: Planets, 126(4), e2020JE006613.Stixrude, L. (2014). Phil Trans R Soc A, 372(2014), 20130076.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,014

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,218
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetGeological Studies and Exploration→Travaux en français237 207→