Ionospheric Outflow in the Magnetosphere of Saturn
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is well known that the ionosphere is an important mass source at Earth during periods of intense geomagnetic activity, but less attention has been dedicated to studying the ionospheric mass source at Saturn. Felici et al., 2016 described an ionospheric outflow event from Saturn's magnetotail, when Cassini was located at ≃ 2200 h Saturn local time at 36 RS from Saturn. During several entries into the magnetotail lobe, a tailward flowing cold ion beam was observed directly adjacent to the plasma sheet and extending deeper into the lobe. These ions, which were mostly H+, appeared to be dispersed, dropping to lower energies with time. The ion composition showed mainly H+. Ultraviolet auroral observations showed a dawn brightening, and upstream heliospheric models suggested that the magnetosphere was being compressed by a region of high solar wind ram pressure.Here, we report the results of a survey of ionospheric outflow events using data from the Cassini Plasma Spectrometer Singles (CAPS) collected in Saturn's magnetosphere. By examining the spacecraft's position relative to the plasma sheet, flow direction, and ion composition using Cassini Magnetometer data and CAPS Time of Flight data, as described by Felici et al., 2016, we confirmed that these were ionospheric outflow events and mapped them within Saturn's magnetosphere.Auroral and solar wind activity during these events were analyzed using data from the Cassini Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph and results from the ENLIL solar wind propagation model.We obtained number flux values at 10000 km altitude ranging from 5.24 x106 to 1.63 x109 cm-2 s-1. These values are within the range reported by Glocer et al., 2007, which is 7.3 x106 to 1.7 x108 cm-2 s-1 However, our values are lower than those estimated by Felici et al., 2016, which range from 2.95 x109 to 1.43 x1010 cm-2 s-1. We attribute this discrepancy to the fact that their study assumed completely cold ions, overestimating speeds and therefore the number flux, for the differential energy flux calculations. In contrast, calibrated moments for Cassini CAPS data are available at the time of this study. From the number flux, source rate could be estimated if the knowledge of the area of the emitting region could be inferred without too many assumptions. Felici et al., 2016 postulated that the outflow could have originated from regions different from the polar cap, and estimated the mass rate provided by an active region that covered the main auroral oval - as aurora images were available in their case - which resulted to be between 49.7 and 239 kg/s (assuming all ions to be H+), revealing that the ionosphere could release a mass quantity the same order of magnitude as Enceladus (60–100 kg/s).Future work will include an analysis of ionospheric outflow in the Jovian system, and comparisons with models of ionospheric outflow at the Gas Giants, and between observed outflow at the two planets.AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by NASA under award numbers 80NSSC23K1275 and 80NSSC19K0892. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.References Felici et al. (2016), doi:10.1002/2015JA021648.Glocer et al., (2007), doi:10.1029/2006JA011755.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».