MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412122235 · doi:10.5194/epsc-dps2025-1119

Laboratory Evaluation of a Methane Spectrometer for the Martian Atmosphere

2025· preprint· en· W4412122235 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Kevin Axelrod, John E. Moores, H. M. Sapers

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiquePlanetary Science and Exploration
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAstrobiologyMethaneAtmosphere of MarsAtmosphere (unit)Environmental scienceSpectrometerMartianAtmospheric methaneMars Exploration ProgramAtmospheric sciencesRemote sensingPhysicsChemistryMeteorologyGeologyOptics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Methane observed in the Martian atmosphere is not stable on geological timescales, suggesting a source on Mars that is active today [1]. Several theories have been proposed that link this atmospheric methane to emission from ancient subsurface reservoirs (such as methane hydrate clathrates) [2,3], hot water/rock reactions (e.g. Fisher Troph-Type Processes) [4], exogenous input of organic material (e.g. Interplanetary Dust Particles), [5] or biological activity [4]. However, methane is currently measured in the near-surface atmosphere only a few times per year, making testing these theories challenging [6, 7]. Methane on Earth is primarily biological, making the methane cycle on Mars of great astrobiological interest. This instrument could also provide important thermochemical data about the Martian subsurface[1].Figure 1: The ABB breadboard prototype spectrometer.Figure 1: The schematic for the experimental breadboard spectrometer.The Martian Atmospheric Gas Evolution (MAGE) experiment was proposed to provide the data needed to distinguish between different theories of the origin and evolution of methane in the Martian atmosphere. A small gas spectrometer, based around the ABB Integrated Cavity-enhanced Optical Spectroscopy (ICOS), is a Canadian instrument that could be deployed to sample the concentration of atmospheric methane on an hourly basis [3].Methodology: For this work, we use an experimental ICOS spectrometer which represents a prototype of a future spectrometer capable of flight to Mars. Images of the breadboard instrument (Figure 1) and its schematic (Figure 2are shown. The prototype spectrometer contains 2 lasers, a 1659 nm laser analyzing concentrations of 12CH4 and 13CH4, and a 1650 nm laser analyzing concentrations of 12CH4 and CO2.The prototype spectrometer’s 1659 nm laser was tested using with a balance gas of carbon dioxide. Mass flow controllers were used to make methane concentrations of 1000 ppmv and 10 ppmv. Tedlar bags were used to make theoretical concentrations of methane of 1 ppmv and 10 ppbv by serial dilution. As there was difficulty obtaining a concentration of methane below 10 ppm due to methane contamination of the CO2 background gas, the runs of 10 ppm, 1 ppm, and 10 ppb are considered equivalent due to background gas contamination. The graphs below show the raw data, processed data with a uniform window filter of size 10 applied, and the data with the drift removed by subtracting the filtered data from the raw data. A mean line goes through the center of the graph. The integration times discussed further in the results section are calculated using the results with the drift removed.Figure 3: Concentrations of 12CH4 from the prototype spectrometerFigure 4: Concentrations of 13CH4 from the prototype spectrometer.Results: As the seasonal background of methane on Mars ranges in concentration from 0.2-0.7 ppbv, with periodic high spikes of up to 45 ppbv [7], sensitivity in this range would make a flight instrument based on ours suitable for the detection of methane. The instrument takes an average of 16 hours of operation to reach 95% confidence that the concentrations of 13CH4 detected are within 1 ppb of the true value, while it takes an average of 56,647 hours to reach 95% confidence that the values of 12CH4 are within 1 ppb of true values. The significant drop in integration time when observing 13CH4 vs 12CH4 is due to a more stable signal response at lower concentrations of gas. The results from the 10 ppm, 1 ppm and 10 ppb runs are averaged to obtain the operational times discussed above, as they are considered replicas. The long measurement time is largely due to instability caused by noise within the instrument, clearly seen in the results for both 12CH4 and 13CH4 (Figure 3 and Figure 4).Future Work: Future modifications include testing under Mars-like conditions, including testing the instrument with Mars analogue mixtures of gases. This will include pressure changes in the atmosphere to observe how the limits of detection change. If deployed on a Mars rover, or on a rotorcraft, the instrument could help to constrain the potential sinks and sources of Martian methane. Acknowledgments: This work was funded by the Canadian Space Agency FAST program grant No, 19FAYORA13 and is being pursued in collaboration with ABB Inc.References: [1] Atreya, S. K., Mahaffy, P. R., & Wong, A.‐S. (2007). Planetary Space Science, 55(3), 358–369. [2]Stevens, A. H., Patel, M. R. & Lewis, S. R. Icarus 281, 240–247 (2017). [3] Lasue, J., Quesnel, Y., Langlais, B. & Chassefière, E. Icarus 260, 205–214 (2015). [4] Oehler, D. Z., & Etiope, G. (2017)., 17(12), 1233–1264.1657 [5] Schuerger, A.C., Moores, J., Clausen, C., Barlow, N., Britt, D., 2012. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 117, E08007.. [6] Webster, C. R., Mahaffy, P. R., Atreya, S. K., Moores, J. E., Flesch, G. J., Malespin, C., et al. (2018). Science, 360(6393), 1093–1096. [7] Moores, J.E., Sapers, H.M., Oehler, D., Newman, C. and Whyte, L. (2021) 8 pp. published in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol 53, issue 4. https://baas.aas.org/pub/2021n4i125/release/1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetPlanetary Science and ExplorationTravaux en français237 207