Biases on the retrieval of aerosols' properties from VIS-NIR data: the NOMAD case study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Data acquired by spaceborne spectrometers operating in the visual (VIS) and near-infrared (NIR) spectral ranges, are commonly exploited to derive the microphysical properties of planetary atmospheric aerosols (e.g. Adriani et al., 2015; Sindoni et al., 2017; Fedorova et al., 2024; Oliva et al., 2016; Oliva et al., 2018; D’Aversa et al., 2022). The precision with which these properties can be constrained, depends on several parameters (e.g. optical constants, surface albedo spectrum, particles’ shape and size distribution, ecc.) and on the spectral information content in the data. VIS wavelengths alone (~ 0,4 – 0,7 μm) provide information on aerosols’ composition, particles’ density and sizes, allowing the estimation of the optical depth integrated along the line of sight (Oliva et al., 2016). However, in order to constrain these parameters with enhanced precision, the NIR range (~ 0,7 – 3,0 μm) is also required, since it allows to assess how the spectral shape bends towards longer wavelengths (Oliva et al., 2018).Our goal is to exploit the combined nadir datasets of the UVIS (0.2 – 0.65 µm) and LNO (2.2 – 3.8 µm) channels of the NOMAD spectrometer (Neefs et al., 2015) to contrain the microphysical properties of Martian dust (Oliva et al., 2025). The two spectral ranges present a large gap among each other, and this introduces biases in the retrieved parameters due to the unconstrained spectral information in the missing wavelengths. In order to benchmark these biases, we exploit MEx/OMEGA (Bibring et al., 2004) VNIR (0,35 – 1,05 µm) and SWIR-C (0.93 - 2.73 µm) channels’ data. Such an extended interval allows the retrieval of Martian dust clouds’ height and microphysical properties (e.g. Oliva et al., 2018; D’Aversa et al., 2022), that can be used as a proxy for the NOMAD retrievals. By studying dust’s densities and sizes 1) from the full OMEGA spectrum and 2) from the spectrum only covering UVIS and LNO wavelengths, we can derive the bias in the retrieved parameters. Moreover, this analysis allows to calibrate how many UVIS and LNO spectral points need to be considered in the retrieval, in order to balance the information content of the two channels.Preliminary results suggest that dust densities are systematically overestimated (as well as grains’ sizes to a lesser degree) if NIR wavelengths are completely neglected, while such a bias is reduced if LNO range is taken into account.ReferencesAdriani et al., 2015. Faint luminescent Ring over Saturn’s polar hexagon. Astrophys. J. Lett. 808 (1), 5. L16.Bibring et al., 2004. Omega: Observatoire pour La minéralogie, l’eau, Les Glaces Et l’activité. ESA SP-1240: Mars Express: The Scientific Payload. ESA Publications Division, Estec, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, pp. 37–49.D’Aversa et al., 2022. Vertical distribution of dust in the Martian atmosphere: OMEGA/Mex limb observations. Icarus 371, 114702.Fedorova et al., 2024. Distribution of atmospheric aerosols during the 2007 Mars dust storm (MY 28): Solar infrared occultation observations by SPICAM. Icarus 415, 116030Oliva et al., 2016. Clouds and hazes vertical structure of a Saturn’s giant vortex from Cassini/VIMS-V data analysis. Icarus 278, 215–237.Oliva et al., 2018. Properties of a Martian local dust storm in Atlantis Chaos from OMEGA/MEX data. Icarus.Oliva et al., 2025. Martian dust characterization: reanalysis of TGO/NOMAD UVIS and LNO channels’ nadir data. XX Congresso Nazionale di Scienze Planetarie, Pescara, 3-7 Febbraio 2025.Neefs et al, 2015. NOMAD spectrometer on the ExoMars trace gas orbiter mission: part 1—design, manufacturing and testing of the infrared channelsApplied Optics 54, 28, 8494-8520.Sindoni et al., 2017. Characterization of the white ovals on Jupiter’s southern hemisphere using the first data by the Juno/JIRAM instrument. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl072940.AcknowledgementsExoMars is a space mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and Roscosmos. The NOMAD experiment is led by the Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB- BIRA), assisted by Co-PI teams from Spain (IAA-CSIC), Italy (INAF-IAPS), and the United Kingdom (Open University). This project acknowledges funding by the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO), with the financial and contractual coordination by the ESA Prodex Office (PEA 4000103401, 4000121493), by the Spanish MICINN through its Plan Nacional and by European funds under grants PGC2018-101836-B-I00 and ESP2017-87143-R (MINECO/FEDER), as well as by UK Space Agency through grants ST/V002295/1, ST/V005332/1, ST/Y000234/1 and ST/X006549/1 and Italian Space Agency through grant 2018-2-HH.0. The IAA/CSIC team acknowledges financial support from the State Agency for Research of the Spanish MCIU through the ‘Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa’ award for the Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (SEV-2017-0709). This work was supported by the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique – FNRS under grant numbers 30442502 (ET_HOME) and T.0171.16 (CRAMIC) and BELSPO BrainBe SCOOP Project. US investigators were supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Canadian investigators were supported by the Canada Space Agency.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».