Towards asteroid discovery with deep learning in large datasets
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As astronomical surveys evolve to capture ever-larger volumes of data, innovative computational tools are increasingly critical for extracting meaningful signals from petabyte-scale datasets. Deep learning – machine learning algorithms that involve artificial neural networks – offers one such tool. Here, we present convolutional neural network-based approaches to enhance the discovery and recovery of asteroids in survey data. Our research utilizes two very different datasets: two decades of archival crowded field data from the Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA) survey and the ongoing Classical and Large A Solar System (CLASSY) trans-Neptunian objects survey.Though designed to detect microlensing events in the Galactic Bulge and Magellanic Clouds, the MOA survey has incidentally observed several thousand asteroids in two decades of high-cadence imaging data. However, the extremely dense star fields posed a significant challenge to effectively identifying moving sources. To address this, we developed a novel approach that leverages the sky motion of asteroids in consecutive exposures to reveal its ‘tracklet’ – the linear motion path that highlights the asteroids’ movement against the static stellar background (Figure 1). These tracklets formed the basis of our labelled datasets of known asteroids, which we used to train several custom-designed convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We then ensembled the predictions from the best performing models to maximize accuracy and generalization, achieving a recall of 97.67%. In addition, we trained the YOLOv4 object detector to precisely localize asteroid tracklets, achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP) of 90.97%. We are now deploying these trained models across the full MOA data archive to identify both known and previously undetected asteroids – transforming the archival data into a powerful tool for asteroid discovery. In parallel, we applied these deep learning techniques to the CLASSY survey, a Canada France Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) Large Program focused on finding distant TNOs. We labelled over ~75,000 composite images from nightly MegaCam observations, creating a training dataset that spans a variety of asteroid populations, including near-Earth objects, main belt asteroids, centaurs, as well as both real and simulated fast-moving TNOs. Our custom CNNs successfully detected tracklets across these diverse sources, and we once again combined the models to enhance predictive performance and minimize false negatives, achieving a recall of 98.15%. The labelling process highlighted the exceptional depth and clarity of the CLASSY observations as well as the effectiveness of the tracklet approach to identify a diverse range of solar system objects. We are now focusing our efforts on recovering centaurs – which are difficult to isolate because of the vast region they inhabit – from the observations. While our work with CLASSY offers a framework for applying deep learning to future surveys like the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), the MOA archive uniquely demonstrates the untapped potential of archival microlensing datasets. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of building targeted training datasets and applying model ensembling to maximize discovery. Together, these strategies offer a practical blueprint for integrating artificial intelligence into the data pipelines of future surveys, ensuring that the scientific potential of next-generation observatories is fully realized.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».