Meta-analysis of the incidence and risk factors of postoperative delirium in organ transplant patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a concerning complication of organ transplantation. With organ transplantation offering hope to patients with end-stage organ disease, understanding the incidence and risk factors of POD is crucial, as it can significantly affect patients' prognosis and healthcare costs. AIM: To systematically evaluate the incidence and risk factors of POD following organ transplantation to facilitate clinical prevention and optimize patient management and prognosis. METHODS: Multiple databases such as PubMed and their reference lists were comprehensively searched using a combination of keywords related to organ transplantation and POD. Relevant observational studies on patients who had undergone solid organ transplantation and randomized controlled trials containing relevant analyses were included. Duplicated, data-deficient, non-English, and non-original data studies were excluded. Data were extracted independently by two researchers and then cross-checked. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. RevMan 5.3 was employed for data analysis. The pooled incidence of POD was calculated according to the data type, and the fixed or random effect model was employed to analyze risk factors based on heterogeneity. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessments were performed. RESULTS: A total of 39 relevant literatures were included. The overall incidence of POD in the organ transplant group was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI): 18%-22%]; liver transplant group, 22% (95%CI: 17%-26%); lung transplant group, 34% (95%CI: 23%-45%); and kidney transplant group, 6% (95%CI: 2%-10%). Primary graft dysfunction increased the POD risk, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) (95%CI) of 1.78 (1.09-2.91). A history of hepatic encephalopathy increased the POD risk, with a pooled OR (95%CI) of 3.19 (2.30-4.43). The higher the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, the greater the POD risk, with a pooled OR (95%CI) of 1.52 (1.09-2.12). A history of alcohol abuse increased the POD risk, with a pooled OR (95%CI) of 2.84 (1.74-4.65). Thus, the higher the model for end-stage liver disease score, the greater the POD risk, with a pooled OR (95%CI) of 2.49 (1.14-5.43). POD was more likely to develop in patients with preoperative infections, with a pooled OR (95%CI) of 2.78 (1.56-4.97). The use of diuretics increased the POD risk, with a pooled OR (95%CI) of 2.36 (1.38-4.04). CONCLUSION: In this study, the overall incidence of POD in patients who underwent organ transplantation is 20%. The incidence varies among different types of organ transplantation, and multiple factors can increase the POD risk.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».