Abstract A008: AI-Predict: Artificial intelligence-mediated drug synergy prediction and validation in cancer models
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: In precision oncology, monotherapies frequently result in resistance and disease relapse, emphasizing the need for rational drug combinations. Identifying effective combinations remains challenging due to the immense combinatorial space, tumor-specific molecular heterogeneity, and the limited scalability of experimental screening. Drug repurposing offers a promising and cost-effective alternative by leveraging compounds with known safety profiles. In recent years, machine learning approaches have been proposed to predict drug synergy, yet many remain limited by reliance on static datasets, batch effects, and minimal biological validation. Methods: We present a graph neural network (GNN)-based model that predicts drug synergy using molecular structure and gene expression data from cancer cell lines. Drugs are represented as molecular graphs and processed through GATv2 layers to capture structural relationships. Cell lines are encoded via attention-based embeddings of 908 landmark genes, capturing transcriptomic context. The model outputs the probability of synergy for each drug pair–cell line triplet and is trained using binary cross-entropy with L2 regularization. For in vitro validation, human cancer cell lines (ovarian UWB1.289, renal 786-0, and breast BT-549) were cultured under standard conditions and routinely tested for Mycoplasma contamination. Results: Our model was trained on the DrugComb v1.5 dataset (>1.4M triplets), annotated with four synergy scores (Loewe, Bliss, HSA, ZIP) and three consensus-based labels (Majority-2/3/4). We benchmarked performance against classical ML models, DeepSynergy, DeepDDS, and a GNN baseline with standard GAT layers. Across seven datasets, our model consistently outperformed all baselines, with gains of 3–18% in AUPR and 3–6% in AUC. It also maintained strong performance in generalization tasks involving unseen drugs and cell lines. To confirm biological relevance, we tested predicted drug pairs in vitro across three human cancer cell lines: ovarian (UWB1.289), renal (786-0), and breast (BT-549). We selected combinations with high predicted synergy, high antagonism, and low interaction probability. Each pair was tested under different exposure times (72h–8 days) and six-point dose-response curves based on known drug properties. Synergistic pairs showed enhanced cytotoxicity, while antagonistic combinations resulted in reduced efficacy. Neutral predictions aligned with additive effects. Context-dependent differences further highlighted the relevance of transcriptomic integration. Conclusion: Our GNN-based model demonstrates strong predictive performance for drug synergy and generalizes across biological contexts. In vitro experiments validate its translational utility, supporting its application in drug repurposing and personalized combination therapy. Future directions include testing in patient-derived models and leveraging experimental feedback to refine predictions through active learning. Citation Format: Alicia Pliego, Chantal Pauli, Lara Planas-Paz, Michael Krauthammer, Amina Mollaysa, Kyriakos Schwarz, Sarah Kollar, Ahmed Allam. AI-Predict: Artificial intelligence-mediated drug synergy prediction and validation in cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A008.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».