Abstract A005: Monotherapy cancer drug-blind response prediction is limited to intraclass generalization
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract In this work, we seek to characterize the learned feature space of cancer drug response prediction models in a drug-blind setting and quantify the limits of their generalizability. Drug-blind prediction failure describes the inability of models to predict cell line response to drugs in the test set that are not present during training. The experiments performed in this study utilize a two-arm multilayer perceptron model where embeddings for drugs and cell-lines are calculated separately and then concatenated to predict response. Drug structure is represented by Morgan fingerprint while cell lines utilize gene expression values. We first examine the connection between learned drug features and cell lines by permuting responses within both cell lines and drugs during model training. When permuting response values within cell lines, model performance was entirely depleted, but permutation of responses within drugs resulted in only a 10-15% decrease in performance. This displays the bulk of model performance is due to learned distributions of response for each drug. We also determine the impact of dataset size on drug-blind performance. Increasing the cell line examples per drug did not improve performance, but drug-blind performance exhibited higher variance than mixed set testing. From these experiments, we hypothesized that drug-blind performance was a function of the set of drugs in the training set. We trained a set of 208 models with varying training set and constant test set and fit an elastic net model using drugs in the training set as features and performance of each model as the target. We were able to accurately predict the drug-blind performance of a model, measured in Pearson correlation, based on the drugs in the training set with a mean absolute error of 0.049. We then trained a set of 1641 models where all drugs in the dataset were present in the test set but only 50% of unique drugs were present during training. Hierarchical clustering on the coefficients of an elastic net model fit to each unique drug’s performance across all models shows drugs cluster into groups that correspond to specific mechanisms of action. By examining the relationship between drug embeddings during model training, we see that decreasing validation loss corresponds to reinforcement of mechanistic relationships of drugs not captured by raw Morgan fingerprints. Finally, we show that training on a dataset confined to a single mechanism of action significantly improves overall mixed set performance on those drugs against training on the entire set of drugs. In this study, we identify that drug-blind performance in current large pharmacogenomic datasets is limited to generalization within drug mechanism of action classes. Therefore, global drug-blind prediction benchmarking is a poor indicator of model generalization as the data itself creates these limits, not model architecture. As more data is collected on novel anti-cancer compounds, we hope that the results presented here create a foundation on which to measure progress in cancer drug generalization. Citation Format: William G. Herbert, Paul A. Jensen, Nicholas Chia, Marina RS. Walther-Antonio. Monotherapy cancer drug-blind response prediction is limited to intraclass generalization [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr A005.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,021 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».