Developing and Integrating Digital Sources in an Accessible and Sustainable Online Platform for Adolescents and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Collaborative Design Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Digital support for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors is fragmented and results in lacking a reliable overview of support services available to them. Collaborative design promises to integrate perspectives of diverse stakeholders and could help to develop an online platform, which increases access and has a long-term perspective. However, it has not yet been explored how collaborative design can be used more strategically to develop an online platform with these aims. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore how a collaborative design approach could be applied to develop an online platform for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, focusing on three key objectives: integrating existing resources, improving accessibility, and ensuring long-term financial sustainability. METHODS: In this action research study, we reflect on a collaborative design process to develop an online platform for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. A quantitative questionnaire was sent out to adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and health care professionals. Stakeholders were actively engaged in stakeholder consensus meetings, and project management was carried out through monthly design meetings to facilitate coordination and decision-making of the development of the platform. Afterwards, a focus group was conducted among the project group to evaluate the collaborative design approach, analyzed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Through the collaborative design approach, several Dutch organizations collaborated to develop, enhance, and combine online services for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors and their relatives. A dedicated online "young and cancer" platform for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors was developed, which integrates different types of information tools and supportive interactive elements from different sources. The integration of different resources into one platform improves the access and user experience of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors when it comes to online support. Through the reflection about the collaborative process, three themes were identified: (1) value of stakeholder participation; (2) conditions for working with adolescents and young adults with lived experience; and (3) collaboration between adolescents and young adults with lived experience and professionals from different backgrounds and organizations. CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative design approach can be used to efficiently develop an online platform for adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. The collaboration among professionals, including online developers, researchers, and adolescents and young adults with lived experience facilitated a direct translation of insights into the platform, while the support of the national cancer platform provides long-term sustainability. This study highlights the importance of strategic stakeholder selection and the intense involvement of stakeholders through a collaborative design approach.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,044 | 0,027 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».