Achieving Optimal Treatment Targets and Minimal Disease Activity with Upadacitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Integrated Analysis of Phase 3 Studies (Measure Up 1 and 2)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Aiming High in Eczema/Atopic Dermatitis (AHEAD) guidelines recommend achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) in atopic dermatitis (AD), defined as simultaneous achievement of optimal treatment targets for at least one clinician- and one patient-reported outcome (ClinRO + PRO). We assessed the effect of upadacitinib on achieving optimal ClinROs, optimal PROs, and MDA in Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293) and Measure Up 2 (NCT3607422) studies for patients with moderate to severe AD. Patients were randomized to receive upadacitinib (15 mg or 30 mg) or placebo. Achievement of ≥ 1 optimal target in ClinROs, ≥ 1 optimal target in PROs, and MDA (≥ 1 optimal ClinROs and ≥ 1 optimal PROs) were reported at weeks 16 (upadacitinib vs placebo) and 52 (upadacitinib only). MDAs in selected combinations were also assessed at weeks 16 and 52. A total of 1683 and 1124 patients were included in the week 16 and 52 analysis, respectively. At week 16, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving upadacitinib (15 mg: 42.5%, 30 mg: 55.9%) compared with placebo (6.4%) achieved MDA. At week 52, 57.4% and 69.9% of patients receiving 15 mg and 30 mg of upadacitinib achieved MDA, respectively. Specifically, patients receiving upadacitinib attained higher rates of ≥ 90% reduction from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 90) + Worst Pruritus-Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) 0/1 at week 16 (15 mg: 25.3%, 30 mg: 39.4% vs placebo: 1.8%) and maintained at week 52 (15 mg: 38.1%, 30 mg: 46.9%). Treatment with upadacitinib achieved both ClinRO and PRO optimal treatment targets as well as MDA and may optimize overall disease management in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) often suffer from skin symptoms such as itch, pain, and rash. These symptoms affect the patient’s sleep, mental health, and quality of life. Optimal treatment goals for AD have been established for skin severity assessments made by the doctor (ClinRO) and symptom and quality of life assessments made by the patient (PRO). Patients are said to have achieved minimal disease activity (MDA) when they achieve an optimal ClinRO treatment goal and an optimal PRO treatment goals. In this article, we report the results from two clinical trials (Measure Up 1 and 2) where patients received either upadacitinib (15 mg or 30 mg) or placebo for treatment of their AD. After 16 weeks, patients who took upadacitinib were more likely to achieve optimal ClinRO or PRO treatment goals and MDA compared to patients receiving placebo. Most patients receiving upadacitinib achieved optimal ClinRO or PRO treatment goals and MDA after 52 weeks of treatment. This study found that patients with AD experienced high levels of both skin improvement and symptom relief after 16 and 52 weeks of upadacitinib treatment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».