Durvalumab Alone or Combined With Novel Agents for Unresectable Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Importance: The PACIFIC trial established durvalumab as the standard-of-care therapy for unresectable, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without progression following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). Novel immunotherapy combinations involving the anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody oleclumab or the anti-NKG2A monoclonal antibody monalizumab have the potential to build on the durvalumab standard of care. Objective: To report updated results from the phase 2 COAST trial of consolidation durvalumab alone or combined with oleclumab or monalizumab in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no progression following cCRT. Design, Setting, and Participants: COAST was an open-label, phase 2, multidrug platform randomized clinical trial conducted across 73 sites globally. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 or 1 and no progression following definitive platinum-based cCRT were enrolled between January 2019 and July 2020. The data cutoff for this final analysis was July 18, 2023. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to March 2024. Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1:1, stratified by histologic type within 42 days after cCRT, to durvalumab alone or durvalumab combined with oleclumab or monalizumab for up to 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Efficacy end points were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. Results: Of 189 randomized patients (median [range] age, 65 [37-87] years; 129 males [68.3%]; 176 [93.1%] current or former smokers), 186 received treatment consisting of durvalumab plus oleclumab (n = 59), durvalumab plus monalizumab (n = 61), or durvalumab alone (n = 66). Of these patients, 1 (0.5%) self-reported as American Indian or Alaska Native, 14 (7.5%) as Asian, 8 (4.3%) as Black or African American, 1 (0.5%) as Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 159 (85.5%) as White, and 3 (1.6%) as other race. After a median (range) follow-up in all patients of 30.1 (0.4-48.9) months, confirmed ORR was numerically higher with durvalumab plus oleclumab (35.0%; 95% CI, 23.1%-48.4%) or monalizumab (40.3%; 95% CI, 28.1%-53.6%) than with durvalumab alone (23.9%; 95% CI, 14.3%-35.9%). However, the difference in ORR for durvalumab plus oleclumab (11.1 [-6.4 to 28.1] percentage points) and durvalumab plus monalizumab (16.9 [-0.8 to 33.4] percentage points) was not statistically significant compared with durvalumab alone. Both combinations prolonged PFS vs durvalumab alone (plus oleclumab: hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.37-0.93]; plus monalizumab: HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.40-0.99]) but did not demonstrate nominal associations with longer OS (plus oleclumab: HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.40-1.20]; plus monalizumab: HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.44-1.33]). Safety was comparable across arms, without new or notable safety signals. Conclusions and Relevance: In the COAST trial, combining consolidation durvalumab with oleclumab or monalizumab provided additional clinical benefit over durvalumab alone. This finding supports further investigation of these novel combinations in the phase 3 PACIFIC-9 trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03822351.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».