From Ledger to Ledgerless: Evaluating Blockchain-Driven Real-Time Financial Reconciliation in U.S. Public Companies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper offers a thorough assessment of how blockchain technology is changing the real-time financial reconciliation environment in US publicly traded corporations. Blockchain is a promising solution that offers openness, efficiency, and automated control as businesses struggle with the growing complexity of financial monitoring, particularly in the wake of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). In particular, the paper discusses how to comply with SOX Section 404, which requires strong internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), a requirement that has historically relied on post-hoc data validation and manual audits. Blockchain technology has made it possible to replace traditional reconciliation models with real-time, tamper-proof ledgers, allowing for ongoing financial transaction verification across numerous company divisions and outside partners. Examining actual deployments in three significant U.S. companies IBM, Walmart Canada, and JPMorgan Chase that have all embraced blockchain technologies to update their reconciliation procedures, the paper investigates this revolutionary change. These examples show how smart contracts and decentralized ledgers drastically cut down on transaction latency, reduce human error, get rid of pointless manual entries, and produce an open audit trail that both internal and external stakeholders may view. Additionally, this study looks at how blockchain can be operationally and technically integrated into older ERP systems, specifically SAP and Oracle. Because of their centralized architecture, these systems have long been essential to corporate financial operations face significant integration issues. The efficiency of middleware, blockchain modules certified by SAP, and blockchain integration frameworks in accomplishing smooth reconciliation are examined. It is critically evaluated how smart contracts can automate the compilation of journal entries, the validation of invoices, and the matching of goods receipts. The study also looks at the wider regulatory ramifications of blockchain-led reconciliation, specifically how well it complies with the guidelines established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Blockchain can change compliance from a reactive to a proactive process by producing immutable, real-time data, giving regulators more insight and confidence in financial reporting. In the end, this study shows how blockchain technology can be used for financial reconciliation, but it also has the ability to change audit procedures, simplify compliance, and rethink financial governance in post-SOX corporate America.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».