Acupuncture and Moxibustion for Poststroke Depression: Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Poststroke depression (PSD) is a common complication following stroke. In recent years, several systematic reviews have evaluated the effects of moxibustion and acupuncture on PSD; however, their findings have been inconsistent. Objective: This overview of systematic reviews aimed to assess the methodological quality, reporting quality, and strength of evidence of existing systematic reviews on acupuncture and moxibustion for PSD. In addition, this study also analyzed the limitations of previous studies and suggested directions for future research. Methods: Systematic reviews concerning acupuncture and moxibustion for PSD published before August 10, 2024, were identified from 8 databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. Eligible studies included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing moxibustion and acupuncture for the treatment of PSD. The methodological quality, reporting quality, and evidence quality were evaluated using AMSTAR 2 (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2), PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020, and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation), respectively. The corrected covered area was calculated to assess overlap among the included primary studies. Results: A total of 24 studies were included. According to the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 assessment, all studies were rated as having "low" or "critically low" methodological quality. Based on PRISMA, 1 study demonstrated seriously inadequate reporting quality, while 21 studies had partially inadequate reporting quality. The quality of evidence in the included reviews ranged from very low to moderate. Most of the primary outcomes exhibited mild to moderate overlap among studies. Conclusions: Most of the included systematic reviews indicated that acupuncture may be beneficial for PSD. Nevertheless, the methodology, reporting, and evidence quality of these reviews require improvement. Stronger evidence will depend on the conduct of larger, multicenter, rigorously designed randomized controlled trials, as well as high-quality systematic reviews.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,122 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».