Study protocol for a multi-session randomized sham-controlled trial of PCC- and amygdala-targeted neurofeedback for the treatment of PTSD
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is marked by distressing and often chronic symptoms, including the reliving and re-experiencing of trauma memories, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, heightened arousal and reactivity, and dissociation. Current psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies may yield suboptimal results for many individuals with PTSD, underscoring the need for new approaches. Recent neuroimaging research highlights functional disruptions in brainstem, cerebellar, limbic, and cortical networks underlying PTSD. Real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rt-fMRI-NFB) is an emerging intervention that has directly targeted limbic (i.e., the amygdala) and cortical (i.e., the posterior cingulate [PCC]) regions and has shown promising initial findings in PTSD. However, key research gaps remain, such as the need for rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to establish clinical efficacy and neurophysiological specificity, determine optimal brain targets, and evaluate dose-response relationships. METHODS: This double-blind, multi-session RCT investigates whether targeting distinct brain regions via rt-fMRI-NFB yields differential therapeutic effects in individuals with PTSD (n = 72). Participants will be randomly assigned to PCC-targeted rt-fMRI-NFB, amygdala-targeted rt-fMRI-NFB, or a sham-control group. Each participant will complete three rt-fMRI-NFB sessions over three weeks, with clinical assessments at baseline, after each session, and at a one-month follow-up. The sham group will receive a 'yoked' feedback signal from a random participant in one of the experimental groups. The primary outcome is PTSD symptom severity, measured using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Secondary outcomes include depressive symptoms, emotion regulation difficulties, dissociation, anxiety, interoceptive awareness, sleep quality, and state PTSD symptoms during trauma provocation. Neural outcomes will also be examined, focusing on brain activation and connectivity patterns. Additionally, qualitative interviews and actigraphy will assess participants' subjective experiences and track sleep and physical activity patterns. DISCUSSION: This trial aims to address critical research gaps by evaluating the therapeutic potential of rt-fMRI-NFB targeting the PCC and amygdala in PTSD. By employing a wide range of data collection methods, this study will provide valuable insights into the clinical and neural effects of rt-fMRI-NFB. This study will be the first to investigate the phenomenological dimension and physiological impacts of rt-fMRI-NFB in this population. Taken together, these findings are expected to contribute to the development of targeted neurofeedback interventions and clarify the therapeutic mechanisms underlying rt-fMRI-NFB for PTSD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the trial registration number NCT05456958. It was initially registered on July 13th, 2022, and most recently updated on October 9th, 2024.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».