MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412462061 · doi:10.1007/s12325-025-03274-9

Efficacy and Safety of TV-46000 and Second-Generation Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2025· review· en· W4412462061 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Kelli R. Franzenburg, Rolf Hansen, Mark Suett, Stephen F. Thompson, Martin Sergerie, David E. Garcı́a, Howard C. Margolese

Notice bibliographique

RevueAdvances in Therapy · 2025
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSchizophrenia research and treatment
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreEVERSANA (Canada)Global Affairs Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineMeta-analysisRandomized controlled trialSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)MEDLINESystematic reviewInternal medicinePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

TV-46000 [once monthly (q1m) or once every 2 months (q2m)] is a subcutaneously administered long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) formulation of risperidone for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. As second-generation LAIs become available, understanding comparative efficacy and safety is needed. We undertook a systematic literature review (SLR; January 1, 2020 to May 11, 2023) and network meta-analyses (NMAs) of randomized controlled clinical trials to compare the efficacy and safety of TV-46000 q1m and q2m with second-generation LAIs approved in Canada and used for treatment of schizophrenia [intramuscular aripiprazole monohydrate q1m, paliperidone palmitate q1m (PP1M), and paliperidone palmitate once every 3 months (PP3M)]. The primary efficacy outcome was relapse rate at 6 months, while safety outcomes were adverse event (AE)-related discontinuation, significant weight gain (≥ 7%), treatment-related AEs, and injection-site pain. Sixty-one records from 24 studies were included in the SLR, and 6 were included in the NMAs. For the relapse rate at 6 months, all treatments were significantly better than placebo, with relative risks (RRs) ranging from 0.23 for TV-46000 q1m to 0.46 for PP1M 50–150 mg eq and no significant differences among LAIs. There were no significant differences between TV-46000 and either placebo or PP1M 25–100 mg eq for AE-related discontinuation. TV-46000 q1m, PP1M 25–100 mg eq, and TV-46000 q2m were significantly less likely to cause weight gain ≥ 7% than PP3M (RR: 0.09, 0.09, and 0.06, respectively) or PP1M 50–150 mg eq (0.08, 0.08, and 0.06, respectively). Treatment-related AEs were significantly less likely with PP1M 25–100 mg eq, TV-46000 q1m, and placebo than PP3M (RR: 0.48, 0.62, and 0.66, respectively). There were no significant differences in injection-site pain between groups. TV-46000 q1m and q2m demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to second-generation LAIs approved in Canada and used for maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. Injectable drugs that work for long periods of time have successfully been used to treat schizophrenia. TV-46000 is injected under the skin once monthly or once every 2 months. It is approved in the United States to treat schizophrenia in adults. When new medications become available, doctors need to understand the safety of that medication and how well it treats the symptoms of the disease compared with similar medications. We searched for studies that used injectable medication approved in Canada and used for the long-term treatment of schizophrenia. We used the results from our search to compare TV-46000 with medications in our search. To study how well the medications treated the disease, we looked at how many patients had a relapse of symptoms by 6 months on the medication. For safety, we looked at: (1) how many patients left the studies because of side effects, (2) if the medication caused weight increase, (3) other side effects experienced, and (4) pain at the injection site. All the medications we looked at were better than placebo (inactive injections) at reducing the number of patients who had a relapse at 6 months. TV-46000 injected every month or every 2 months showed the same safety results as placebo injections. This analysis showed that TV-46000 generally had the same safety and ability to treat symptoms as other injectable medications approved in Canada and used for the long-term treatment of schizophrenia.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,367
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0360,003
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,085
Tête enseignante GPT0,423
Écart entre enseignants0,338 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAdvances in TherapyMême sujetSchizophrenia research and treatmentTravaux en français237 207