Current Practice and Expert Perspectives on Cultural Adaptations of Digital Health Interventions: Qualitative Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Some people are less likely to benefit from digital health interventions (DHIs) than others. Culture, along with other factors, contributes to these differences. DHIs that do not address a population's cultural norms or concerns are likely to be less effective. One way to create culturally sensitive DHIs is through cultural adaptations. Yet, there is currently little evidence-based guidance on when and how to adapt DHIs. Objective: We aimed to capture the experiences of experts to understand the (1) current practices, (2) challenges, and (3) recommendations around culturally adapting DHIs. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews (n=15) via Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, Inc) between May and August 2023, with academic experts who have previously undertaken cultural adaptations of DHIs. Experts were identified through publications and snowball sampling. We used a thematic analytical approach, beginning with a preliminary deductive codebook and then following a three-stage analysis. All transcripts were coded with the MAXQDA (VERBI Software GmbH) software. Codes were reviewed, and similar or related codes were categorized into broader themes, consolidating one or multiple codes into a single topic. Results: Our analysis produced 30 codes, which were categorized into (1) defining culture, (2) justifying the adaptation, (3) choosing the adaptation elements, (4) implementing the adaptation, (5) understanding the challenges, and (6) recommendations. Based on their experiences, experts recommended that (1) the adaptation team is multiprofessional, digitally competent, and culturally sensitive; (2) DHI users and (3) all other relevant stakeholders are continuously involved; and (4) the adaptations incorporate evaluations and knowledge exchange. They further emphasized that culturally adapted DHIs must be understandable, relatable, appealing, and easy to adhere to, ensuring that health technology and content reflect the target population's lived experiences, sociodemographic characteristics, and digital literacy. When asked which elements of cultural DHI adaptations, the most common responses were language, lived experience, and technology. Responses revealed five common DHI-relevant challenges, including (1) technology, (2) uncertainty, (3) user involvement, (4) communication, and (5) evaluation and sustainability. Conclusions: The cultural adaptation of DHIs was described as an iterative, often unstructured, and resource-intensive process that requires careful justification and a solid understanding of the culture and the specific cultural group for which it is implemented. Our interviews confirmed the absence of technology-specific frameworks to guide the cultural adaptations of DHIs. Based on our findings, such a framework should guide the choice of the correct definition of culture and the criteria for assessing the need to adapt. It should also offer tools to drive stakeholder engagement, prioritize adaptation elements, and address common challenges.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,077 | 0,074 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,014 | 0,018 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,011 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».