MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412501346 · doi:10.32342/3041-2196-2025-1-29-4

RESOCIALIZATION OF ADOLESCENTS ON PROBATION: PSYCHOSOCIAL APPROACH WITH ELEMENTS OF COACHING

2025· article· en· W4412501346 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Inesa Harkusha, Serhii Dubinskyi

Notice bibliographique

RevueAlfred Nobel University Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiquePsychology of Development and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésResocializationCoachingPsychosocialPsychologyPsychotherapistSociologySocial science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The article discusses current approaches to the resocialization of adolescents on probation in the con- text of psychosocial support. The purpose of the article is to identify the specific features of the resocialisation of conditionally sen- tenced adolescents in the context of psychosocial support, in particular through the integration of coaching- based elements as a factor in enhancing the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes. The study employed methods of retrospective and categorical analysis of primary sources and aca- demic literature, as well as techniques of analogy, comparison, and generalisation. Modern models of probation are analysed, the peculiarities of working with adolescents who are registered are determined, and the expediency of integrating coaching elements into the resocialization process is substantiated. The importance of forming intrinsic motivation, responsibility and self-regulation skills in adolescents through a coaching approach as an effective complement to traditional methods of psy- chological influence is emphasized. It is noted that in many countries, approaches to working with juvenile offenders are being rethought. Traditional methods of resocialization are complemented by innovative psychosocial tools aimed not only at controlling, but also at developing the personal potential of an adolescent. Based on the analysis of primary sources, it is established that macro-social factors of children’s delin- quent behaviour have a negative impact on minors and do not directly lead to their committing illegal acts. They are mediated by the adolescent’s immediate environment and manifest themselves as family and per- sonal problems. A crime can be a way of overcoming problems caused by social factors and a reaction to frustration caused by the inability to overcome them in other ways. It is noted that some countries have special closed institutions for juvenile offenders (USA, Canada, France). In modern criminal law of different countries, resocialization of convicts is considered as a key ele- ment of the penitentiary system. It is stated that the legislation of some countries does not explicitly provide for the term “resocializa- tion”, but its content is implicitly present in the general policy of the State on the treatment of offenders. Modern models of resocialization are closely related to the penitentiary system, but differ in the degree of integration and interaction with it. It is determined that the forms of educational and upbringing work with young people, as well as the nature of deviant behaviour, largely depend on the type of institution that performs an educational or pre- ventive function. In the context of modern approaches and individualized models to the resocialization of minors, the introduction of coaching approaches is becoming increasingly relevant. It is determined that coaching, as a form of psychological assistance in the educational and social en- vironment, contributes to the formation of young people’s ability to self-development, autonomy, internal responsibility and positive self-esteem. It has been concluded that the use of the coaching approach as a tool for developing intrinsic motiva- tion, responsibility and self-regulation skills in persons in conflict with the law is particularly promising. The combination of preventive experience, educational initiatives, and coaching strategies creates potential for the humanisation of resocialisation approaches in Ukraine and for the development of an environment con- ducive to the positive behavioural transformation of juvenile offenders.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,139
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,519

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,346
Écart entre enseignants0,321 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAlfred Nobel University Journal of Pedagogy and PsychologyMême sujetPsychology of Development and EducationTravaux en français237 207