PARTNERSHIP PEDAGOGY AMID CURRENT EDUCATIONAL TRANSFORMATIONS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article explores the historical foundations and specific features of partnership pedagogy in the context of current educational transformations. The purpose of the article is to summarise theoretical approaches and practical models of partnership pedagogy in the context of current transformations in the educational landscape, to analyse its forms and levels of implementation in national and international educational practice, as well as to identify potential barriers and prospects for the further integration of partnership strategies into Ukraine’s education system. The research employed a range of interrelated methods: theoretical analysis of scholarly literature and regulatory documents to clarify the concept of “partnership pedagogy” and its interpretations in both domestic and international discourses; comparative analysis of foreign and national experiences in imple- menting partnership-based approaches in education; interpretive and reflective methods to explore the ty- pology, levels, and content dimensions of educational partnership; and methods of systematisation and generalisation to identify barriers to implementation and outline prospects for its further development. It is established that partnership pedagogy is an educational concept grounded in the principles of equi- table interaction, mutual responsibility, trust, and cooperation among all participants in the educational pro- cess. It serves as a relevant methodological basis for educational practice across all levels of education. With- in educational discourse, partnership encompasses not only formal collaboration among stakeholders but also phenomena such as co-participation, mutual accountability, trust, subject–subject relations, dialogic engage- ment, and cooperation. In the context of education governance, partnership is interpreted as coordination of actions, joint decision-making, and the involvement of all stakeholders in planning, implementing, and eval- uating educational policy. It is emphasised that educational partnership represents not only a pedagogical practice but also a vital component of educational policy in many countries in response to global challenges. It is outlined that the transformation of partnership pedagogy from a humanistic pedagogical concept into an interdisciplinary approach integrating pedagogical, managerial, and sociocultural practices of interaction among educational actors and stakeholders is evident. A comparative analysis of Ukrainian and international models of educational partnership is conducted, with particular attention to the New Ukrainian School Concept. The article also examines the institutionalisation of partnership practices in the EU, the United Kingdom, Finland, the USA, Canada, and Australia. Innovative methods, forms, and technologies for implementing partnership in- teraction in higher education institutions are identified. Examples of successful educational practices based on co-creation, dialogue, and shared responsibility – particularly in the context of Students as Partners initiatives, e- portfolios, design thinking, dual education, and project-based learning – are synthesised. The article substantiates the stages of partnership development in higher education: from the mod- elling of practices, expansion and institutional consolidation, and critical reflection to external institutional integration. It outlines the key barriers to the implementation of partnership strategies in Ukraine and sug- gests possible directions for their adaptation to the national educational context. It is concluded that parti cularly relevant for adaptati on to the Ukrainian context are models for es- particularly relevant for adaptation to the Ukrainian context are models for es- tablishing educational and production clusters, virtual universities, scientific-educational hubs, and project- oriented educational networks. However, the meaningful adaptation of relevant international practices is only possible when the national context is duly taken into account – specifically, the characteristics of edu- cational culture, regulatory frameworks, and the willingness of educational stakeholders to broaden their scope of responsibility within partnership-based interaction.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,035 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,016 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,018 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».