Direct Re-Functionalization of Spent LFP Cathodes of Lithium-Ion Batteries by Aqueous Electrochemical Process
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) find many applications from powering multitudes of portable electronics, to automotive, and stationary energy storage. The current rapid market growth, more specifically in mobility and stationary energy storage, has resulted in an exponential increase in the usage of LIBs since early 2000. It is predicted that this market may reach 6.3 TWh by 2030. Inevitably, the quantity of spent LIBs will follow the same trend, causing important challenges to the waste management system. Consequently, we expect an important increase of spent lithium batteries available for recovery during the next decade raising the pressure on the emerging LIBs recycling industry. In addition to this rapid increase in volume of spent batteries, the recent migration from cobalt and nickel rich cathodic materials to lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4, LFP) will impact significantly the current hydrometallurgical processes both on their efficiency and on their profitability. Indeed, the industry has focused until now on recovering the most valuable elements like lithium, cobalt, and nickel while iron and phosphorus from LFP batteries ending to waste. In this context, new low-cost processes that enable the recovery of LFP as highly valuable products are needed. Direct recycling, that aims to re-functionalize the spent LFP as new active material by keeping its initial orthorhombic structure, responds perfectly to these criteria. Hydro-Québec has developed such a process that includes a hydrometallurgical step extracting selectively Li ions as lithium bicarbonate from LFP black mass followed by the relithiation of the obtained iron (III) phosphate (FePO4, FP). Research in collaboration with McGill University has elucidated the chemistry of the process [1,2] and determined the relithiation step to be crucial to the re-functionalization of LFP since it restores the spent cathode’s Li-ion storage capacity [3]. While most relithiation processes are performed by high-temperature treatments or hydrothermal methods, Hydro-Québec’s process is an ambient temperature aqueous solution electrochemical relithiation method that has been recognized for its potential for industrial applications [4]. The results show that FP can be efficiently relithiated using either Li2SO4 or LiHCO3 electrolyte. The FP reduction reaction follows mostly a Cottrellian behavior, determined from potentiostatic experiments, indicating that diffusion in the solution is a critical mechanism. The application of this electrochemical relithiation process to FP originating from the delithiation of black mass from spent LFP batteries, resulted in a 96% relithiation yield at a current efficiency of 91%. The overall recycling process successfully re-functionalized deeply damaged spent LFP recovering up to 99% of the LFP’s original discharge capacity, achieving up to 153 mAh g-1 at C/12. Meanwhile, the initial discharge capacity of the re-functionalized LFP at 1C attained 119 mAh g-1, which interestingly increased upon cycling, reaching 131 mAh g-1 after 225 cycles. This increase could be associated with electrochemical activation promoted by cycling-induced LFP crystal annealing and/or by electrochemical milling. Hence, the final recycled LFP is a re-functionalized cathodic active material suitable for reuse in new LFP battery manufacturing. [1] F. Larouche, et al.; J. Electrochem. Soc. 169 (2022) 73509. [2] F. Larouche, et al.; Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62 (2023) 903–915. [3] F. Larouche, et al.; J. Power Sources 624 (2024) 235533. [4] E. Beletskii, et al.; Energy Environ. Mater. (2024) 1–17.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».