Use of crop residues as substrates for the cultivation of king stropharia (Stropharia rugosoannulata) mushrooms
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
,King stropharia (Stropharia rugosoannulata) is a white rot fungus that produces nutritious edible mushrooms. The species is prized among backyard mushroom cultivators due to its ability to grow on various lignocellulosic substrates in a range of environmental conditions and compete with contaminant microorganisms. These characteristics make king stropharia a great potential tool for enhancing crop residue decomposition in northern environments while producing a valuable crop of mushrooms. However, the species is understudied and underutilized since its production parameters have never been optimized. This study sought to determine 1) which readily available substrate (of alder chips, barley straw and hemp straw) produces the best yield of king stropharia mushrooms, 2) whether substrate impacts the nutritional content of king stropharia mushrooms, 3) how king stropharia chemically alters substrates, 4) how king stropharia alters substrate microbial communities, and 5) which spent substrate makes the best soil amendment for crop production. A cultivation trial was conducted at a farm in Prince George, British Columbia, Canada, from June to October 2022. Eight 1 m by 1 m wooden frames of each substrate were prepared. Five frames each of alder chips and barley straw were inoculated with king stropharia spawn and the three remaining frames served as uninoculated controls. Six frames of hemp straw were inoculated, leaving two uninoculated controls. Substrate samples were collected prior to inoculation and again after the cultivation period. The date, mass and count of mushrooms produced from each frame was recorded. Mushrooms samples were also collected for analysis. Mushroom and substrate samples were analysed for content of carbon, nitrogen and a suite of other elements. Mushrooms were analysed for protein and lipid content. Substrate sample lignocellulosic biomass fractions (lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose) were quantified, and substrate pH and electrical conductivity were tested. Substrate fungal and bacterial DNA were extracted, amplified, sequenced and analyzed. Hemp straw tended to be the fastest and highest yielding substrate in the cultivation trial. Hemp straw appears to have been the best performing substrate due to its water content, nutrient profile, lignin content and surface area to volume ratio compared to the other substrates. There also seemed to be a distinctive bacterial consortium associated with the successful cultivation of king stropharia in barley straw and hemp straw, with high relative abundance of the genera Bacillus and Paenibacillus in these samples. Further cultivation experiments using fresh spawn are necessary to properly assess king stropharia’s yield and effect on substrates since the results of this study were impacted by spawn contamination. All post-cultivation mushroom substrate types had beneficial properties for agricultural soil amendment, even though the substrates were not completely spent at the end of the cultivation trial. King stropharia presents a potential win-win scenario whereby farmers can produce nutritious mushrooms with their crop residues while enhancing crop residue decomposition and nutrient cycling with minimal technology and labour. Although further research is required to fully realize the potential of this species, this study demonstrates how king stropharia can contribute to sustainable agricultural practices.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».