Association of Perceived Xingfu With Health-Related and Socioeconomic Factors Among Hong Kong Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Study Using a Novel Single-Item Tool
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Xingfu (), a Chinese term, holds meanings that transcend Western concepts of happiness; it is modern and highly valued in China. Despite its centrality to China's national discourse on xingfu, there are no validated tools for measuring perceived xingfu, particularly in Hong Kong's unique sociopolitical context. Postpandemic recovery efforts and widening socioeconomic disparities in Hong Kong highlight the urgency of understanding indicators such as perceived xingfu. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate the first single-item measure of perceived xingfu and examine its association with health-related and socioeconomic factors among Hong Kong Chinese adults, addressing gaps in culturally tailored assessment. Methods: Our cross-sectional online survey included 5070 Hong Kong Chinese adults in 2023. Perceived xingfu was measured using a novel, single-item, 11-point scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better perceived xingfu. Two-week test-retest showed high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78). We used regression models to analyze associations between perceived xingfu score and high perceived xingfu (defined as ≥7) with mutually adjusted study variables; all estimates were weighted based on 2022 Hong Kong population data. Results: The mean perceived xingfu score was 6.3 (SD 2.2). Perceived xingfu score was associated with happiness (r=0.85), perceived mental health (r=0.65), and adversity coping capability (r=0.50) and negatively associated with perceived stress (r=-0.56), past 7-days loneliness (r=-0.52), anxiety symptoms (r=-0.45), and depressive symptoms (r=-0.52). Female sex (β=0.69, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.11), older age (β=0.46, aOR 2.67), having post-secondary education or above (β=0.19, aOR 1.35), higher monthly household income (≥ HKD60,000: β=0.99, aOR 3.04), living in owned properties (β=0.27, aOR 1.57), being retired (β=0.56, aOR 1.18), and excellent versus poor self-rated health (β=3.84, aOR 40.72) were associated with higher perceived xingfu score or high perceived xingfu (all Ps or Pstrend<0.001). Conclusions: This study pioneers the perceived xingfu measurement in a Chinese population using a concise, validated tool. Significant socioeconomic disparities and health associations highlight perceived xingfu's relevance to policy priorities, including equitable resource allocation and health support. Our single-item perceived xingfu tool offers practical utility for population surveillance and cross-cultural comparisons. Future research should explore longitudinal trends and integrate perceived xingfu into public health frameworks.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».