The Added Value of Parents Practicing in Virtual Reality to Illustrate the Use of Innovative Methods in Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: Single-Case Experimental Design
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Throughout years of research, the well-known behavioral parent training program, Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), has been adapted and enhanced to tailor the treatment to the needs of families in community-based clinical care. This study wished to evaluate an add-on to PCIT that could be engaging for parents. As a way to enlarge practice opportunity and potentially allow parents to achieve positive treatment effects sooner, this study added virtual reality (VR) to PCIT. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to increase positive parenting skills at a faster pace with the use of PCIT-VR, on the basis that practicing positive parenting skills in the VR tool would increase parents' overall practice time, thus leading to more confidence in their skills, which could consequently increase the pace of skill acquisition. Furthermore, we hypothesized that due to the overall increase in positive parenting skills, PCIT treatment effects such as diminishment of child disruptive behavior and parenting stress would decrease at a faster pace when VR was introduced. METHODS: Families were recruited from a specialized child and adolescent psychiatry clinical practice in the Netherlands. Using a single-case experimental design, 11 families, equating to 18 participants, signed informed consent forms and received the staggered introduction of VR to treatment. As is common with a single-case experimental design, visual inspection analyses and randomization tests were conducted. Group differences were evaluated with nonparametric tests and reliable change indices. RESULTS: Overall, our study reaffirmed that PCIT is an effective intervention for this population as there were positive treatment effects found in almost all cases. Nevertheless, there did not seem to be a clear relationship between the use of the VR tool and PCIT treatment effects, although positive parenting skills seemed to increase when VR was introduced to treatment for some parents. For all parents, questions and comments decreased with the introduction of VR. These findings tentatively suggest that practicing with VR could potentially increase positive parenting skills and also have an impact on other treatment-related outcomes, such as child disruptive behavior and parenting stress. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first time that PCIT has been supplemented with VR. We provide preliminary evidence of its added value. We cautiously suggest that VR could provide added value to PCIT and increase confidence in parenting skills for certain parents, although there are complex factors that play into treatment success that must simultaneously be considered. These factors include parents having the motivation and mental capacity to change and the complex psychological problems some families face. Although promising, we believe that due to the novelty of our VR practice tool and the variety of results from our study, more research is necessary into PCIT-VR to draw further conclusions on its effects.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».