Ecological restoration and ecosystem memory of wildlife forage and understory diversity in a young pine monoculture plantation in central-interior British Columbia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
,Ecological restoration has recently taken center stage in the rehabilitation of degraded forest ecosystems to improve multifunctionality, biodiversity, and wildlife habitat conservation. The research summarized herein assessed the efficacy of variable stand density thinning (200, 400, and 600 stems/ha) and artificial canopy gaps (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 ha in size) as potential restoration treatments to enhance wildlife forage and native biodiversity in a young lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm. ex S. Wats.) forest in central-interior British Columbia. Field data collection was conducted from May-August, 2023 to assess the early response (1-3 years post-treatment) of the forest understory plant community to the treatments. The effects of the restoration treatments and time since treatment on the cover, richness, diversity, and composition of the shrub and herbaceous layer species were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models and permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Additionally, linear models were used to examine the influence of forest floor characteristics (leaf litter, bare ground, downed woody debris, and duff depth) on understory cover, richness, and diversity as well as the impact of the treatments on presence of wildlife activity (based on presence or absence of feces). Both restoration thinning and canopy gap treatments resulted in an increase in understory herbaceous species cover and richness compared to the untreated controls. Species cover, richness and diversity were generally higher in 3-years post-treatment plots compared to 1-year post-treatment plots. Furthermore, herbaceous species composition varied significantly between the restoration treatments versus the controls, with treated plots dominated by shade-intolerant, disturbance-dependent species. Forest floor characteristics, such as percent cover of leaf litter and bare ground, were associated with reduced herbaceous species cover and richness. There was evidence of increased wildlife presence in the thinning and canopy gap treatments (as compared with the untreated controls), where certain species of importance to moose, such as aspen (Populus tremuloides) and willow (Salix spp.), were found. Overall, these results suggest that reducing forest stand density through thinning and artificial canopy gaps may be effective for restoring native plant biodiversity and wildlife habitat in dense monoculture plantations. Soil samples were also collected from the study area for a seedling emergence trial to assess the viability of the soil seed bank. After 6 months of germination under favorable conditions in the greenhouse, predominantly graminoids and ruderals germinated from the seed bank. There was no difference found in the count or identities of the germinants between the restoration treatments, untreated controls, and old-growth reference stands when analyzed using permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Notably, the absence of seeds from target forage species, such as aspen, willow, and birch, from the soil seed bank suggested that we cannot rely solely on the seed bank for passive regeneration of native plant biodiversity in these young pine-dominated forests. Rather, active restoration methods, such as seeding and planting of native forage species, may be needed to rehabilitate and restore understory plant diversity and wildlife habitat in these stands.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».