Harnessing Facebook to Investigate Real-World Mentions of Adverse Events of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1 RA) Medications: Observational Study of Facebook Posts From 2022 to 2024
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in the popularity and use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for weight loss. As such, it is essential to understand users' real-world discussions of short-term, long-term, and co-occurrent adverse events associated with currently used GLP-1 RA medications. Objective: This study aims to quantitatively analyze temporal and co-occurrent GLP-1 RA adverse event trends through discussions of GLP-1 RA weight loss medications on Facebook from 2022 to 2024. Methods: We collected 64,202 Facebook posts (59,293 posts after removing duplicate posts) from January 1, 2022, to May 31, 2024, through CrowdTangle, a public insights tool from Meta. Using English language social media posts from the United States, we examined discussions of adverse event mentions for posts referencing 7 GLP-1 RA weight loss product categories (ie, semaglutide, Ozempic, Wegovy, tirzepatide, Mounjaro, Zepbound, and GLP-1 RA as a class). All analyses were conducted using Python (version 3; Python Software Foundation) in a Google Colab environment. Results: Temporal time series analysis revealed that the GLP-1 RAs' adverse event mentions on social media aligned with several key events: the Food and Drug Administration's approval of Wegovy for pediatric weight management in December 2022, increased media coverage in August 2023, celebrity endorsement in December 2023, and Medicare Part D coverage expansion for weight loss medications in March 2024. Gastrointestinal (GI)-related adverse events (general term) were most prevalent for posts mentioning the GLP-1 RA class (210/4885, 4.30%) and Mounjaro (241/4031, 5.98%). In contrast, the most prevalent adverse event mentions noted for tirzepatide were headache (78/4202, 1.86%) and joint pain (71/4202, 1.69%). Hypertension (13/1769, 0.73%) was frequently mentioned in Zepbound posts, while pancreatitis was commonly associated with Mounjaro posts (44/4031, 1.08%), and 2.85% (139/4885) of posts broadly referring to the GLP-1 RA class. Furthermore, an integrated node network analysis revealed 3 distinct GLP-1 RA adverse events-mentioned clusters: cluster 1 (purple) contained allergies, anxiety, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fatigue, fever, hypertension, indigestion, insomnia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hives, swelling, restlessness, and seizures. Cluster 2 (pink) contained constipation, dehydration, headache, diarrhea, dizziness, hypoglycemia, sweating, and jaundice. Cluster 3 (brown) contained GI symptoms, such as nausea, pancreatitis, rash, and vomiting. The GI symptoms, such as nausea, vomiting, pancreatitis, diarrhea, and indigestion, were strongly associated together (≥100 co-occurrence mentions), while the mentioned neurological symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, and insomnia, were highly correlated with each other (50-100 co-occurrence mentions). Conclusions: This social media study highlights the adverse event mention patterns for posts referencing GLP-1 RA medications. While further research is needed to rigorously examine and validate these findings, this study demonstrates the importance of monitoring social media discussions to predict novel, underreported, or rare drug adverse events, thereby improving patient care, clinical research, and health policy interventions.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».