MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412625618 · doi:10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100424

Investigation of suspected aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a single-centre quality improvement project

2025· article· en· W4412625618 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Abouyannis, Malka Reuben, S. De Miranda, Norman Main

Notice bibliographique

RevueClinical Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineSubarachnoid haemorrhageQuality managementSubarachnoid hemorrhageQuality (philosophy)AneurysmSurgeryOperations management

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) has a global incidence of 6/100,000 person-years, affects people of working age and is associated with a high case fatality rate. 1,2 Between 10% and 43% of cases present with a sentinel headache, which necessitates investigation including a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) head and lumbar puncture (LP). 3 The Ottawa SAH rule is sensitive but only 15% specific, resulting in many people being investigated. 4 This project assessed the investigation of suspected aSAH at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital to guide service improvements, with reference to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines. 5 Materials and Methods Cases were identified by searching the Telepath laboratory management system for all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples that underwent xanthochromia analysis in 2024. Acute medicine clinicians screened the electronic patient records, only included cases where suspected aSAH was the primary reason for undertaking the LP, and extracted clinical, laboratory and radiological data. Statistical analyses were conducted using R v 4.4.2. Results and Discussion There were 187 CSF samples evaluated for xanthochromia, of which 107 (57.2%) were cases where aSAH was the primary reason for investigation and were included in this analysis. Ottawa SAH Rules were fulfilled as follows: thunderclap headache, 63.6%; age ≥40, 59.8%; neck pain or stiffness, 33.6%; onset during exertion, 17.8%; limited neck flexion, 13.1%; and loss of consciousness, 12.1%. There were 6 (5.6%) cases that underwent LP where all Ottawa criteria were either negative or not documented. The median time interval from admission to LP was 23.0 h (IQR 12.7–36.9 h; Fig 1). There were 15 (14%) cases who were triaged within 5 h of headache onset, for whom NICE guidelines advise that aSAH can be excluded based on a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) head performed within 6 h of headache onset, without the need for LP. Nine (60%) of these cases had a non-contrast CT within 6 h of headache onset, yet all proceeded to LP, which were all negative for xanthochromia. Patients admitted or streamed to the same-day emergency care (SDEC) unit had a significantly lower time to LP, compared with cases admitted to the emergency department and transferred to a ward (median 20.2 h vs 44.5 h; Mann-Whitney U, p<0.001). Clotting studies were undertaken for 101 (94.4%) cases, which were unnecessary in 90 (89.1%) cases. The xanthochromia result was positive in 3 (2.8%) cases, negative in 99 (92.5%), inconclusive in 3 (2.8%), and invalid in 2 (1.9%). Among the three cases with a positive xanthochromia, one had an aneurysm identified, which was coiled. Serious LP-related complications were post-LP headaches, which resulted in a prolonged hospital stay (n=2) or re-admission (n=3). Conclusion Multiple adaptations to provide timely diagnosis, and reduce cost and reduce length of hospital stay were identified, including: better adherence to Ottawa SAH rules; when possible, undertaking an urgent CT head within 6 h of headache onset; appropriate use of clotting studies; and streaming appropriate cases to SDEC. Our aSAH pathway is being updated to reflect these recommendations and NICE guidelines. 5

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,281
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,615

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,093
Tête enseignante GPT0,384
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueClinical MedicineMême sujetIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsTravaux en français237 207