Everyday life activities in patients with heart failure
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background People with heart failure (HF) may experience symptoms such as shortness of breath or fatigue leading to avoiding physically demanding activities and becoming sedentary. Engaging in everyday life activities significantly enhances the quality of life and promote physical and emotional well-being. Yet little is known about the performance of everyday life activities in patients with HF. Purpose The aim is to identify important everyday life activities for patients with HF and assess ability to perform the activity and satisfaction with the performance Method This is a cross-sectional study on the baseline data in the "Heart eXg-study," an ongoing randomized controlled trial. Performance of everyday life activities was assessed with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). In COPM activities perceived important to perform are identified and the ability to perform and satisfaction with performance are self-assessed. The ratings are made on a ten-point scale, from one "=not able to do/not satisfied at all" to ten "= able to do it extremely well/extremely satisfied". To describe the patient group, demographic data was extracted from the medical file (age, gender, NYHA-class), mobility was measured with the Times Up and Go (TUG) test, and frailty was assessed with the Clinical Frailty scale. Results In total, 24 patients were included, 67% male (n=16), mean age 78±9, 56% NYHA II, 44% NYHA III/IV. In total 19% of the patients were considered fit or managing well, 46% were living with very mild to mild frailty and 4% were living with moderate frailty. The mean distance on the 6-minute walk test was 338±100 meters and 32% (n=8) of the patients had impaired mobility (>12 seconds in TUG). Walking was a key activity that participants wished to improve. They expressed a desire to walk their dogs, walk longer without experiencing shortness of breath. Social activities for example playing with grandchildren, maintaining contact with friends, dancing and participating in volunteer activities were perceived important. Household chores, such as preparing food, cleaning kitchen cabinets, vacuuming, cleaning the car, and gardening, were also significant. Most patients felt not able to perform these activities (66% scored <6), and 88% were dissatisfied with their performance of everyday life activities (scored <6). Conclusion Patients with HF in this study have challenges in performing activities such as walking, household chores, and social interactions, leading to a high level of dissatisfaction with their performance. The results highlight the need for multidisciplinary interventions to enhance the functional abilities and satisfaction of HF patients in their daily lives. By focusing on the specific activities that patients find important and challenging, healthcare providers can develop more personalized and effective rehabilitation programs. The role of an occupational therapist in the HF team should be further explored
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».