Priority Needs for Participative Administration Focusing on Safety in Schools Under Primary Educational Service Area Office in North-Eastern Region
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This research aimed to 1. study compositions and indicators of participative administration focusing on primary school safety 2. study current condition, desirable condition and priority needs of primary school safety; and 3. study guidelines of participative administration focusing on primary school safety. The research was divided into 3 phrases, which were 1) synthesizing composition and indicator towards school safety, 2) doing survey about current condition, desirable condition, and synthesis of primary school safety, and 3) seeking guidelines for participative administration focusing on primary school safety. The sample consisted of 370 school administrators and teachers, selected based on the sample size table by Krejcie and Morgan, using a multi-stage sampling method. The research tool was a questionnaire, with a reliability coefficient of 0.97 for the current condition and 0.98 for the desirable condition. Data were analyzed using percentage, mean, and standard deviation.The sample group was a group of 370 administrators and teachers with the size that follows Krejcie & Morgan’s table pattern. The group members were selected by multi-stage sampling method. The tool was questionnaire which had reliability on current condition at 0.97 and 0.98 for desirable condition. The data was analyzed using percentage, average, and standard deviation. Priority Needs Index (PNI) was also applied in the analysis, it was found that, 1. There are 5 compositions of primary school safety with 15 indicators. They are 1) student-assistant system 2) prevention and solution methods for accidents within schools 3) prevention and solution methods for accidents related to natural disasters 4) prevention and solution methods for social issues, and 5) student’s well-being control. For participative administration, it has 5 compositions which are 1) participation in planning process 2) participation in work operation 3) participation in decision-making method 4) participation in supervision, and 5) participation in monitoring and evaluation. 2. The overall current condition of participative administration focusing on primary school safety was at a fair level, while the overall desirable condition was at a high level. The most critical need identified was the prevention and resolution of accidents in educational institutions. 3. Participatory management guidelines for primary school safety should emphasize the involvement of all stakeholders in the planning process-from policy formulation and collaborative planning to joint decision-making. Additionally, support should be provided for private organizations to participate in management efforts, including organizing study visits to learn effective strategies for collaborative problem-solving.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».