<scp>COVID</scp>‐19 and Healthcare Workers Burnt out: A Qualitative Study of Burnout Experiences of Healthcare workers in a Secondary Hospital in Ghana
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic emerged between 2019 and 2021, and had a profound and far-reaching impact across all sectors of society, significantly altering daily life and working conditions especially for frontline health professionals. This study explored the burnout context that occurred among health workers, predominantly nurses during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in a secondary hospital facility in Ghana. DESIGN: Descriptive phenomenological design. METHODS: The study adopted a qualitative approach, anchored on a descriptive phenomenological design to explore the dynamics of burnt-out experienced by 12 healthcare staff at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) hospital in Ghana during the COVID-19 pandemic. The (12) healthcare workers, which included six (6) male and six (6) female, were recruited using a convenient sampling technique, guided by a structured interview guide. Adopting a thematic approach, the transcribed data were analysed after data categorisation and manual coding. FINDINGS: Healthcare staff reported a significant increase in workload during the peak of COVID-19 cases, which subsided as case severity decreased over time. Healthcare workers recounted the pandemic's psychological toll, including symptoms of increased stress, worry, and despair exacerbated by severe burnout as a result of the crisis's relentless demands. Despite the obstacles, healthcare workers constantly emphasised their dedication to professionalism, indicating a strong feeling of obligation to maintain patient-centred treatment. A highlight was made in respect of exhaustion and emotional difficulties, though these experiences did not impair the quality of treatment delivered to clients. Providing respectful, empathetic, and equitable care to all patients irrespective of suspected COVID-19 or other diseases remained a central feature of services provided. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This paper presents findings relevant to the provision of quality client care in moments of extreme stress. It provides insights into the challenges nurses go through to secure their health and provide safety for the public in moments of general public fear and discomfort. The findings in this study invite the public to appreciate and equally empathise with emergency health care providers particularly during periods of pandemic.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».