Nonspecific Granular Reactivity of EBER In-Situ Hybridization in a Patient of Black Hairy Tongue
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is well known to be associated with various mucocutaneous disorders in immunosuppressed hosts, especially post-transplant patients. Some of these are oral hairy leukoplakia, EBV-positive mucocutaneous ulcers, and EBV-related cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders.1 The method of choice for detecting EBV infection in formalin-fixed tissue remains in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER).2 Positive EBER in situ hybridization (EBER ISH) test presents as blue nuclear staining of the latently infected cells in formalin-fixed tissue.3,4 Cross-reactivity or false staining of the test has been reported with yeasts, plants, and mucin.5,6 Cross-reactivity with EBER in subcutaneous aluminum granulomas at the site of prior vaccination, presenting as cytoplasmic staining in aluminum-containing histiocytes, has also been documented.7 The mechanism of these cross-reactivities has not yet been confirmed. We report a 70-year-old man, status of 10 years post liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma and receiving tacrolimus. He had a history of multiple cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. In his latest surgery to remove a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, the surgeon also biopsied a tongue lesion that was described as a firm lesion on the dorsal tongue. Biopsy showed acanthotic squamous mucosa with bacterial colonies in the superficial keratotic layers consistent with lingua nigra (black hairy tongue) without evidence of dysplasia or malignancy. Owing to his medical history and the location of the lesion, EBER ISH test was performed to exclude EBV effect. With appropriate positive and negative controls, the keratinocyte nuclei were negative. However, there was a fine granular positivity on the surface of the keratinous layer in the area that we could see superficial bacterial colonies on the H&E-stained slide (Fig. 1).FIGURE 1.: A and B, Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained low- and high-power views of the tongue biopsy specimen, showing hyperkeratosis and acanthosis with bacterial colonies present in the superficial keratotic layer. No evidence of dysplasia or malignancy is observed. C, Epstein–Barr virus-encoded RNA in situ hybridization (EBER-ISH), high-power view, demonstrating fine granular positivity superficial to the keratotic layer.In patients of black hairy tongue, the surface is usually covered by a mixture of debris (including keratin and food, such as pigment-containing drinks like tea or coffee) and bacteria. Whether the fine granular staining seen in our patient is solely due to the stained bacteria or nonspecific absorption of the surface mixture of debris and bacteria cannot be definitively determined. To the best of our knowledge, cross-reactivity of EBER ISH with bacteria has not been previously reported and the possibility of EBV infection of the bacteria is likely biologically implausible, because EBV primarily infects human B cells and epithelial cells. Regardless of whether bacteria or the mixture of debris and bacteria on the surface show cross-reactivity, this represents a false-positive reaction. This observation further supports the idea that proper interpretation of ancillary tests requires evaluation of the H&E histologic context to avoid possible pitfalls.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».