MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412848294 · doi:10.1016/j.lanhl.2025.100731

Occurrence, associated factors, and outcomes of delirium in patients in an adult acute general medicine service in England: a 10-year longitudinal, observational study

2025· article· en· W4412848294 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Healthy Longevity · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNIHR Oxford Biomedical Research CentreRhodes ScholarshipsDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Institute on Handicapped Research
Mots-clésDeliriumMedicineObservational studyDementiaHazard ratioComorbidityGeriatricsOrganic mental disordersLongitudinal studyOdds ratioPediatricsEmergency medicineInternal medicinePsychiatryConfidence intervalDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Reliable estimates of delirium occurrence and outcomes are necessary to inform hospital services, research, and policy, but inclusive cohorts with long-term follow-up are scarce. We aimed to assess the age-specific occurrence of delirium in acute general (internal) medicine, associated factors, and 10-year outcomes stratified by age and comorbid dementia status. Methods This longitudinal, observational study was done at the John Radcliffe Hospital (Oxford, UK). We included consecutive adult patients aged 16 years and older in an acute general (internal) medicine service over six 8-week periods (between Sept 4, 2010, and Nov 15, 2018). Delirium was diagnosed prospectively using the Confusion Assessment Method and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, criteria and subcategorised as prevalent (≤48 h of admission) or incident (>48 h postadmission). Odds ratios adjusted ( adj ORs) for demographics, comorbidity, frailty, and illness severity were calculated for binarised outcomes and adjusted hazard ratios ( adj HRs) were calculated for time to death. Findings 1846 patients were admitted to acute general (internal) medicine (mean age 68·2 years [SD 20·0], age range 16–102 years), 426 (23% [95% CI 21–25]) of whom had delirium (prevalent n=290 [68%], incident n=73 [17%], both prevalent and incident n=63 [15%]), of whom 134 (31·5%) had dementia. 950 (51·5%) patients were female, 895 (48·5%) were male, and sex data were missing for one patient. Delirium increased with age, from six (2% [95% CI 1–4]) of 340 patients younger than 50 years and 31 (9% [6–13]) of 333 patients at age 50–64 years to 57 (20% [16–25]) of 281 at age 65–74 years, 245 (35% [31–38]) of 704 at age 75–89 years, and 87 (46% [39–54]) of 188 at age 90 years and older. Of the 37 patients younger than 65 years who had delirium, 28 (76%) had an underlying neurological or neuropsychiatric disorder. In those aged 65 years or older, delirium was overall associated (all p<0·001, age and sex adjusted) with dementia ( adj OR 3·63 [95% CI 2·65–4·98]), pre-admission dependency (2·63 [2·02–3·43]), comorbidity burden (1·04 [1·02–1·05]), and frailty (moderate vs low risk 3·62 [2·70–4·85] and high vs low risk 11·85 [7·24–19·42]), with stronger associations in patients without comorbid dementia than in those with comorbid dementia. Delirium predicted inpatient stay longer than 7 days ( adj OR 2·48 [1·84–3·35]), discharge care needs (2·41 [1·70–3·40]), and mortality during admission (2·45 [1·52–3·94]). The increased risk of death in the delirium group was highest in the immediate postadmission period and attenuated thereafter, but was maintained for up to 10 years of follow-up ( adj HR 2·03 [95% CI 1·40–2·97] for 30-day mortality vs 1·52 [1·30–1·77] for 10-year mortality). Excess inpatient mortality was highest in younger age groups versus older age groups ( adj OR 4·38 [95% CI 1·18–16·31]; p=0·028 at age 65–74 years vs 1·96 [1·02–3·75]; p=0·043 at age 75–89 years and 2·86 [1·14–7·16]; p=0·025 at age 90 years or older) and in those without versus with comorbid dementia ( adj OR 3·02 [1·73–5·25]; p<0·001 vs 1·47 [0·58–3·75]; p=0·42). Interpretation Our findings support current guidelines for routine on-admission delirium screening from age 65 years. Delirium outcomes are relatively more adverse in those aged 65–74 years without comorbid dementia in whom interventions and clinical trials should be prioritised. Funding National Institute for Health and Care Research and the Medical Research Council.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,054
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,081
Tête enseignante GPT0,376
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle