Neurotropic and non-neurotropic equid alphaherpesvirus 1 (EHV1) mobilize most histones within viral replication compartments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Equid alphaherpesvirus 1 (EHV1) is a DNA virus that causes severe disease outcomes in equids. Some EHV1 strains are neurotropic and cause disease in the central nervous system, whereas others are non-neurotropic and can cause negative reproductive outcomes. The molecular mechanisms that govern pathotype of individual EHV1 strains are not understood. However, EHV1 replication in the presence of epigenetic inhibitors suggests that neurotropic and non-neurotropic EHV1 are differentially susceptible to epigenetic silencing. Aside from this evidence, little is known about EHV1 chromatin or its regulation. Here, we used fluorescence recovery after photobleaching to characterize EHV1 lytic chromatin dynamics. Infection with neurotropic or non-neurotropic EHV1 mobilized all histones. Canonical (H2A, H2B, H3.1, H4) or variant (H2A.B, H2A.Z, H2A.X, macroH2A, H3.3) core and linker H1.2 histones were equally mobilized by either strain. Thus, there were no vast differences in histone mobility during neurotropic or non-neurotropic EHV1 infection. All histones except for H2A.B were more mobile within EHV1 replication compartments (RCs) than the surrounding infected-cell chromatin. The differential mobility of histones within domains enriched for viral or cellular chromatin is consistent with distinct mechanisms to assemble and regulate the chromatin associated with viral or host DNA. Histones were further mobilized within RCs in cells in which infection had further progressed. Such mobilization indicates that increased levels of EHV1 transcription, DNA replication, or protein expression directly or indirectly mobilize histones. The high histone mobility within EHV1 RCs is consistent with assembly of EHV1 genomes in very dynamic and unstable nucleosomes. These data support a model in which EHV1 limits genome silencing by preventing stable chromatin assembly, or destabilizing the chromatin assembled, with viral genomes during lytic infection. We propose that manipulation of histone dynamics represents a novel mechanism of epigenetic regulation adopted by alphaherpesviruses to maintain genome accessibility and prevent gene silencing. Author summary DNA viruses are subjected to epigenetic regulation that silences or promotes gene expression. Multiple epigenetic mechanisms contribute to stabilize chromatin to silence gene expression or destabilize it to promote gene expression. Knowledge of the mechanisms whereby viruses prevent or overcome genome silencing and promote expression of their genes is important to understand how viruses, including alphaherpesviruses, take over the host cell to establish productive infection. Here we show that EHV1 broadly mobilizes histones within nuclear domains enriched in viral chromatin. Histone mobilization destabilizes chromatin and is consistent with the assembly of EHV1 genomes in dynamic, unstable nucleosomes. The manipulation of histone mobility is a phenomenon first described for the alphaherpesvirus herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV1). The conserved approach to dysregulate chromatin dynamics and mobilize histones represents a unique means whereby herpesviruses destabilize chromatin. Understanding the mechanisms that mobilize histones during infection will increase our general understanding of epigenetic regulation, which is important in the pathogenesis of infectious diseases and also of developmental or genetic ones. Moreover, knowledge of the processes whereby herpesviruses destabilize chromatin will support the development of novel therapeutics to maintain viral genomes in stable, silenced chromatin to prevent productive infection and development of associated diseases.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».