Integrating Mental Health Services Into Perinatal Care: Challenges and Opportunities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: In most low-income countries, including Ethiopia, mental healthcare has not been fully integrated into perinatal services. As a prerequisite for the integration, this project aimed to understand the facilitators and barriers to integrating mental health services into perinatal care. Methods: This exploratory qualitative research used in-depth interviews with 25 purposely selected participants representing diverse stakeholders (perinatal women, health service coordinators and providers, and community health workers and community volunteers). The transcribed interviews were coded and analyzed using Atlas ti Software. Results: The study found the following major impediments to providing and receiving perinatal mental health services: a) the lack of sense of ownership and accountability, b) constraints related to institutional resources and infrastructure; c) inequitable access to healthcare; d) the absence of supportive policy framework with focus on perinatal mental health; e) cultural beliefs and community perceptions; f) limited support from stakeholders; g) limited practice of compassionate and respectful care; and h) poor service planning and coordination. The opportunities for the integration of mental healthcare into perinatal services are a) the presence of maternal and child health (MCH) and mental health professionals, b) a conducive structure linking hospitals to the community and c) a convenient institutional infrastructure, d) higher level government support. Strategies suggested for the integration are awareness creation, capacity building, development of guidelines and checklists, and stakeholder engagement. Conclusion: The current Ethiopian primary healthcare system offers a conductive structure for the integration of mental healthcare into perinatal services. The existing bottlenecks against the service integration can be tackled by training health professionals, community sensitization, and advocacy and generating evidence that leads to the development of evidence-based implementation tools and health service delivery models tailored to local needs. The strategies outlined in this study may be used to design perinatal mental health services at multiple levels. Plain Language Summary: Why was this studyconducted? This study explored barriers and facilitators to integrate mental health into maternal and child health services. What did this study find? The absence of providers trained on perinatal mental health, absence of implementation tools, and limited focus on perinatal mental health deter the integration of mental health into MCH services.Cultural perceptions also deter seeking service for mental health problems during perinatal period.The existing primary healthcare structure of Ethiopia offers a favorable condition to integrate mental health into maternal and child health services. What do these results mean? The integration of mental health into MCH services requires community sensitization, engagement of stakeholders and training of providers at different levels. The service integration also requires the development of implementation guidelines and tools.The strategies outlined in this study might be used to design perinatal mental health services at multiple levels with the Ethiopian Healthcare System. Keywords: mental health, perinatal mental health, Ethiopia, service integration, maternal and child health
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».