MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412910526 · doi:10.1093/mam/ozaf048.948

Advanced Electron Microscopy to Study the Collagen-Mineral Nanocomposite in Human Bone: From On-Axis Electron Tomography to 4D-STEM

2025· article· en· W4412910526 sur OpenAlexaff
Chiara Micheletti, Alex Lin, Peter Ercius, Aurélien Gourrier, Furqan A. Shah, Anders Palmquist, Kathryn Grandfield

Notice bibliographique

RevueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Établissements canadiensBrockhouse Institute for Materials ResearchMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésElectron tomographyMaterials scienceElectron microscopeNanocompositeBone mineralElectronNanotechnologyBiomedical engineeringNuclear magnetic resonanceScanning transmission electron microscopyTransmission electron microscopyPathologyOpticsMedicinePhysicsNuclear physics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

From a materials perspective, the bones in our skeleton are a composite of proteins, primarily type I collagen, and a calcium-phosphate mineral, hierarchically assembled across several length scales [1]. At the smallest level of bone architecture, collagen fibrils and mineral particles form an intricate nanocomposite whose precise organization has puzzled researchers for decades. Different interpretations of the collagen-mineral spatial relationship have largely stemmed from technical limitations of the imaging tools used, especially when inferring three-dimensional (3D) information from two-dimensional (2D) (scanning) transmission electron microscopy (S/TEM) images. Adding to the complexity, bone structure appears different depending on the orientation of collagen fibrils with respect to the image plane. When imaged in-plane, collagen fibrils display a characteristic banding pattern due to their periodic staggering [2-4]. However, when visualized out-of-plane, seemingly empty or low-contrast circular regions, hereinafter referred to as “holes”, become visible [2-4]. Are these “holes” cross-sectional images of collagen fibrils, or are they nanopores, possibly occupied by non-collagenous proteins? Extensive debate has also taken place around the nature of bone mineral, particularly regarding the distinction between mineral located within the collagen fibrils (intra-fibrillar [5]) or on their outer surface (inter- or extra-fibrillar [6]), as well as the mineral habit; are mineral particles needle-like or plate-like? Recently, we combined on-axis Z-contrast electron tomography (ET) with correlative energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) tomography to shed light on the nature of the alleged nanoporosity and on the shape of mineral in human bone [7]. For this, we employed rod-shaped samples up to 700 nm in diameter prepared from the femoral cortex by focused ion beam (FIB) annular milling, and acquired tilt series of both STEM images and EDX maps of representative elements (Ca and P as mineral signatures, and C and N as proxies for collagen) over a ±90° range. This allowed us to combine structural and compositional information at high resolution over a larger volume than conventional electron tomography, where lamellar-shaped samples are employed. Moreover, rotating the samples over a complete ±90° range in on-axis ET enabled artifact-free 3D reconstructions, overcoming the missing-wedge sampling limitation of conventional ET. Analysis of these 3D reconstructions via virtual re-slicing revealed that the “holes” observed in one plane correspond to the banding pattern in mutually orthogonal planes, demonstrating that the apparent nanoporosity actually represents collagen fibrils in cross-section. Segmentation of extra-fibrillar mineral identified platelets a few tens of nanometers in length and width and a few nanometers in thickness, splaying over multiple fibrils in a cross-fibrillar fashion. EDX tomography confirmed mineralization both within and outside the collagen fibrils, but highlighted an enrichment in mineral content in the extra-fibrillar phase [7]. While this work provided spatial and compositional information on the collagen-mineral nanocomposite, some questions on the mineral itself remain. Bone mineral is generally accepted to be a carbonate-substituted apatite deficient in hydroxyl ions [8], but other phases such as octacalcium phosphate have also been reported, especially at mineralization sites [9]. Some debate also persists on eventual differences between intra-fibrillar vs. extra-fibrillar mineral, with some authors proposing the former to be in a less crystalline state [10]. To obtain crystallographic information (degree of crystallinity, orientation, and morphology) on bone mineral at the individual collagen fibril level, we employed four-dimensional (4D)-STEM to overcome the limitations of conventional selected area electron diffraction (SAED). In SAED, diffraction patterns (DPs) contain crystallographic information averaged over the area defined by the SA aperture, typically a few micrometers in diameter, hence encompassing several mineralized collagen fibrils. In contrast, in 4D-STEM, a focused electron beam 1-10 nm in diameter is rastered across the sample, and a DP is recorded at each position of the probe. This results in a 4D dataset where a 2D DP corresponds to each location of a 2D raster of the beam. This enables virtual dark-field imaging post-acquisition. For our 4D-STEM experiments, we used FIB milling to prepare electron-transparent lamellae of human femoral cortical bone in different orientations with respect to the long axis of the femur. This made it possible to have collagen fibrils with varying orientations ranging from in-plane to out-of-plane. High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF)-STEM images and 4D-STEM data were acquired in each sample in a S/TEM instrument operated in scanning mode at 300 kV with a convergence semi-angle of 0.7 mrad, and equipped with an ultrafast 4D Camera [11] (TEAM 0.5, National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, CA, USA). Over one million DPs were collected in 2 × 2 µm2 regions at a probe step size smaller than 2 nm, while limiting beam exposure thanks to the ultrafast acquisition (87,000 frames per second). Thanks to 4D-STEM, we were able to resolve and map crystallographic information in greater detail than SAED, thus achieving a more precise spatial correlation between mineral crystallinity and bone structure at the nanometer scale. When collagen fibrils were in-plane, we observed the 30°-wide arc typically reported for the {002} reflections of bone mineral (c-axis of apatite crystals). We then divided this arc into three sub-components by placing distinct virtual apertures in the diffraction space, in turn revealing patches of similarly oriented crystals, mostly within the inter-fibrillar spaces (Fig. 1). On the other hand, no {002} reflections were detected in samples where collagen fibrils were out-of-plane, as expected since the c-axis of apatite is normal to the image plane. In this case, when considering virtual dark-field images obtained from distinct reflections in the DPs, different sets of plate-shaped regions were illuminated, suggesting that the mineral is organized into straight single-crystalline domains arranged around individual collagen fibrils (Fig. 2). Overall, on-axis correlative ET and EDX tomographies, together with 4D-STEM, can expand the characterization toolbox to probe bone structure at the level of its building block unit, the mineralized collagen fibril. The combination of these techniques is potentially helpful beyond its application to normal, healthy bone in the study of pathological conditions that affect bone at the most fundamental level. The information provided by these techniques can indeed reveal how various diseases affect the structure and composition of mineral aggregates, as well as mineral organization and crystallinity in relation to collagen fibrils. HAADF-STEM image of the human bone sample oriented with collagen fibrils in-plane (A) and corresponding dark-field images overlaid on the HAADF-STEM image (B). These dark-field images were obtained by placing virtual apertures (red, green, and blue circles) on the {002} reflections in the global DP (virtual apertures and dark-field images are colour-coded) (C). HAADF-STEM image of the human bone sample oriented with collagen fibrils out-of-plane (A), and virtual dark-field images obtained from the region marked in A (B). These dark-field images were obtained by placing virtual apertures on distinct reflections in the DPs (virtual apertures and dark-field images are colour-coded) (C).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,250 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisMême sujetBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsTravaux en français237 207