MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4412911784 · doi:10.1093/mam/ozaf048.791

X-Ray Absorption-Corrected STEM-EDS Tomography for Absolute Quantification Across Interfaces in a Mg-Al-Ca Alloy

2025· article· en· W4412911784 sur OpenAlexaff
Jessica E. Snelson, Jinliang Yuan, Sean M. Collins, Katherine E. MacArthur

Notice bibliographique

RevueMicroscopy and Microanalysis · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAlloyMaterials scienceX-rayTomographyAbsorption (acoustics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsChemistryMetallurgyComposite materialPhysicsEnvironmental chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Achieving absolute elemental quantification (atoms/nm3) in three dimensions is essential for understanding the microstructural origins of mechanical and functional properties of materials. Tomographic approaches, such as tilt-series tomography using X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy in the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM-EDS), are needed to interrogate nanoscale compositional heterogeneity at interfaces. Inclined and three-dimensional interfaces obscure interface abruptness in two-dimensional analysis. Moreover, disentangling contributions from the sample surface in transmission requires three-dimensional elemental tomography. STEM-EDS tilt-series tomography, however, is complicated by detector shadowing [1] as well as sample thickness (often constrained by the dimensions of the microstructural features of interest) due to X-ray absorption within the sample along distinct three-dimensional and tilt-dependent trajectories to the EDS detectors [2, 3]. Here, we report on the development of absorption-corrected STEM-EDS tomography with absolute quantification. We take a Mg-Al-Ca alloy as a materials system that poses specific challenges for EDS quantification: All Kα emission lines are below 5 keV with Mg and Al Kα below 2 keV, the Al Kα emission line falls just past the onset of X-ray absorption K edge for Mg, and susceptibility to surface oxidation means samples in electron microscopy include oxygen contributions that do not correspond to the bulk alloy composition. Mg-Al-Ca alloys are of significant interest for automobile and aerospace sectors for the development of lightweight alloys that retain suitable creep-resistance within the higher operating temperatures sought for Mg-alloys (125-200°C) [4]. Such Mg-Al-Ca alloys exhibit a characteristic microstructure comprising soft α-Mg within an intermetallic skeleton. The interface between the skeleton and α-Mg plays a key role in cracking and failure [4]. We have consequently sought to develop STEM-EDS tomography for quantification of composition across these critical interfaces. We extracted a sample from such a Mg-Al-Ca alloy across an interface between α-Mg and the intermetallic skeleton in the form of a needle geometry by focused ion beam (FIB) milling. The needle geometry was selected to ensure the sample volume remained consistent throughout the tilt-series. STEM-EDS data were then collected on an FEI Titan G2 80-200 at the Ernst Ruska-Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich. A STEM-EDS spectrum image tilt-series was collected, taken every 10° between -60o and +60o (13 spectrum images). For quantification, we implemented a partial cross-sections approach using standards-based calibration [5]. MgO and CaCO3 powder samples and an Al wedge sample were selected as calibration standards. For MgO and CaCO3, a single STEM-EDS spectrum image was acquired at 0o tilt followed by a STEM tomography tilt-series to enable cross-section determination from particle standards [6]. Electron energy loss spectroscopy was used for thickness determination alongside STEM-EDS spectrum imaging for cross-section determination from the wedge sample [7]. X-ray absorption and shadowing corrections were then incorporated within the tomographic reconstruction process. For X-ray absorption correction, our approach differs to previous tomographic methods for absorption correction using Cliff-Lorimer quantification and rotation of the reconstruction volume for X-ray trajectory determination3 by now using absolute quantification for the determination of the three-dimensional density and rotated X-ray trajectories within a fixed reconstruction volume [3]. For shadowing correction, the total number of atoms was used for normalisation, updated iteratively in parallel with iterative calculations of X-ray absorption. We have carried out these reconstructions using compressed sensing algorithms based on second order total variation (CS-TV2) to support reconstructions of the Mg-Al-Ca needle with piece-wise linear variation in composition. Figure 1 presents a volume rendering of the STEM-EDS reconstruction using CS-TV2 as well as a map highlighting the oxidation of the sample surface. To benchmark these results, we have also compared the absolute quantification using CS-TV2 reconstructions with STEM-EDS tomography using the simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique (SIRT) together with quantification parameters (scattering and ionization cross-sections) from the Monte Carlo programme MC X-ray for relative composition quantification [8, 9]. Three main compositional bands were identified in the needle (Figure 1a). The uppermost, labelled band 1, was identified as the α-Mg. Two further bands exhibited mixed compositions, denoted bands 2-3. Band 2 contained Mg as a major fraction while Band 3 was majority Al and contained the greatest Ca fraction. Given the position of the Al Kα emission line within the Mg K edge absorption, bands 2-3 were most susceptible to inaccuracies in compositional quantification with absorption-correction. Figure 2a-d illustrates the changes in Al content after absorption-correction in band 3. Final relative quantification results for both reconstruction approaches were similar, though CS-TV2 reconstructions exhibited lower sensitivity to absorption effects. Three-dimensional analysis also revealed heterogeneity within these bands and their interfaces (Figure 2e). Although the interfaces between bands were inclined relative to the electron beam, line profiles could be extracted perpendicular to these interfaces within the reconstruction volume. The dashed line in Figure 2e at ii) marks the interface between bands 2 and 3, with an increase in magnesium concentration at i) just before the interface. The increase in concentration of Al is flagged by iii) and shows small band of a different composition just after the band 2/3 interface. These findings establish significant finescale compositional heterogeneity can occur at interfaces in Mg-Al-Ca alloys and demonstrates the power of absorption-corrected STEM-EDS tomography [10]. a) three-dimensional compressed sensing reconstruction of the metal alloy needle. b) EDS map of oxygen in metal alloy needle. a,b) Elemental composition of band 3 after absorption correction for a) CS-TV2 and b) SIRT reconstructions. c,d) Al concentration in band 3 before and after absorption correction for c) CS-TV2 and d) SIRT reconstructions. e) Line profile extracted perpendicular to the inclined interface from within the 3D volume.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,276 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueMicroscopy and MicroanalysisMême sujetMagnesium Alloys: Properties and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207