Melatonin as a potential biomarker in diabetic retinopathy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Melatonin protects against inflammation and oxidative stress. This review focuses on the literature comparing melatonin levels in patients with and without DR. Methods: A thorough search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase databases was performed for articles published until April 2025. The inclusion criteria were studies reporting melatonin levels in patients with DR and control groups; studies involving human participants of any age, gender, or ethnicity; and investigations documented in scholarly publications. The exclusion criteria were as follows: animal studies; review articles; case reports; editorials; and conference abstracts; studies not available in English or lacking an English translation; and studies focusing on interventions altering melatonin levels rather than comparing levels between patients with DR and controls. Furthermore, we manually checked the reference lists of the included papers to identify any earlier series that were not initially found in our core search. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate study quality. Results: Eight studies with 1004 participants published from 2011 to 2022 were included. The mean age of participants ranged from 39.9 to 72 years. Three studies assessed urinary melatonin excretion, three examined blood melatonin concentrations, one evaluated melatonin concentration in the aqueous humor, and one measured salivary melatonin levels. All samples were collected at night, except for three studies. All studies utilized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure melatonin concentration, except for the one study, which employed high-performance liquid chromatography. Numerous studies have indicated that patients with DM exhibit reduced melatonin levels relative to healthy controls, and that individuals with DR show lower levels than those without DR. Patients with proliferative DR exhibit reduced nocturnal urinary excretion of 6-sulfatoxymelatonin. Melatonin levels in the aqueous humor were elevated in patients with proliferative DR. Melatonin levels were negatively correlated with both the duration of DM and glycated hemoglobin levels. Conclusions: The findings of this review suggest that patients with DM, particularly those with DR, exhibit altered melatonin production. Reduced systemic melatonin levels may correlate with increased risk and severity of DR. However, the majority of included studies had a case-control design, which hinders the ability to draw causal conclusions regarding the association between melatonin levels and DR. Moreover, confounding factors, including age, duration of DM, medication use, and lifestyle characteristics of participants, were not uniformly considered, and the limited sample sizes restrict the applicability of the results. Future investigations should emphasize longitudinal studies to clarify the temporal dynamics between melatonin levels and DR progression Additional investigations are required to clarify the function of melatonin in the pathogenesis of DR and its viability as a therapeutic target.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».