The Effect of Discharge Planning Videos and Booklets on Quality of Life Among Patients With Heart Failure: Quasi-Experimental Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Heart failure remains a major global health issue, significantly impacting patients' quality of life due to its chronic and progressive nature. Effective discharge planning, including educational interventions such as videos and booklets, plays a crucial role in enhancing self-care management and overall patient well-being. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of discharge planning videos and booklets on the quality of life of patients with heart failure. Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental design and was conducted at PKU Muhammadiyah Gamping Hospital from July to November 2024. A total of 42 participants who met the inclusion criteria were selected based on sample size calculations using G*Power and were evenly assigned to intervention and control groups. Both groups received standard discharge planning provided by health care professionals. Discharge planning videos and booklets were developed as educational tools for the intervention group. The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire was used to assess quality of life. The independent sample t test was used to analyze the effect of the intervention using SPSS (version 29). This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board (number 150/KEP-PKU/VII/2024). Results: The intervention significantly improved the quality of life of patients with heart failure, with the mean score decreasing from 39.00 (SD 8.11) to 24.76 (SD 4.02; P<.001) in the intervention group. In contrast, the control group showed minimal change, from 39.90 (SD 5.89) to 40.24 (SD 5.84), resulting in a statistically significant between-group difference of 15.58 (P<.001). Furthermore, the effect size was large (Cohen d=3.09), suggesting a strong practical significance of the intervention in enhancing the quality of life among patients with heart failure. Moreover, the mean Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire scores across 4 domains-physical, mental, emotional, and social-also showed significant improvements after the intervention. The intervention group experienced reductions in all domains: physical (9.95 to 6.76), mental (7.81 to 5.62), emotional (13.19 to 7.48), and social (8.05 to 4.90), whereas the control group showed minimal or no change. These results indicate that the intervention effectively improved patients' quality of life across multiple dimensions. Conclusions: Discharge planning through videos and booklets may improve the quality of life of patients with heart failure compared to standard care. These findings highlight the potential clinical value of structured patient education. The intervention appeared to enhance patients' understanding of their condition and support self-management behaviors, including adherence to lifestyle recommendations. However, they should be interpreted with caution and confirmed through further studies with larger and more diverse populations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».